Loose Ends, etc.

Tying up some loose ends here with a lot of small things that don’t quite deserve entire posts of their own. This is all the miscellaneous stuff I’ve been doing in recent weeks, but haven’t really gotten around to posting about. So, without further ado…

Anime:

  • Deadman Wonderland was alright, nothing spectacular though. The fights weren’t mindblowingly amazing, and the characters were pretty meh, so all in all it was your usual shonen stuff.
  • Blue Exorcist lost my interest about halfway through, and I didn’t watch the rest. More averagey shonen stuff than Deadman Wonderland.
  • The World God Only Knows season 2 kept the same level of quality as the first season - it was the kind of show that I’d start watching, and my brother would come over to watch it without knowing why. If you get the humour, you’ll really enjoy it.
  • Steins;Gate is still running, and it’s some pretty sweet time-travel stuff. I recommended Chaos;Head last summer (that’s a really long post, I’m just reminding you it exists), and Steins;Gate is better overall, I think. Okabe, the mad scientist, is hilarious at all times (I AM MAD SCIENTIST, IS SO COOL. SUNUVABITCH.). There’s some heart-string-tugging, too. Definitely worth checking out.

        I also watched Summer Wars last week while waiting for EBGames to open and give me my copy of Catherine. It was kind of the anime equivalent of a Hollywood summer blockbuster - in other words, take the forgettable cash-grab junk and replace it with beautiful art and a fun little scrappy-kid-saves-the-world story that doesn’t overstay its welcome. Also, they do some neat future-esque computer stuff that is actually possible, which makes it more awesome somehow. I was really happy when the gamer kid lends his laptop to a guy and switches to a different virtual desktop on his desktop-cube.

——————————————————

        I watched American Beauty a few weeks ago, and I’d definitely recommend watching it. I’m not sure what to say about it, really, because it doesn’t have any one core thesis, but it’s got a ton of little ideas worth thinking about and it’s open to a lot of interpretation. I don’t know a whole lot about any of the parts of film, but I can tell there’s a lot of artistry in it. If you’re going to watch a movie, you may as well watch this one instead of some dumb romantic comedy or popcorn-munching action movie.

——————————————————

        I’ve started and nearly finished Breath of Fire: Dragon Quarter for the PS2, and I think it’s fantastic. I really think it’s one of the better jRPGs I’ve played in recent memory, though my backlog for those has tons of quality stuff waiting to be played. It takes a lot from roguelikes - you can restart the game and keep the equipment, money, and some of the experience you’ve gained, and the more restarts you’ve done, the more you unlock of the story. It’s a very quick, focused version of a jRPG - I’ll probably be pushing 30-40 hours by the time I finish my first time, but the game rates a “perfect” playthrough as 8 hours or less. It’s just really solid mechanics, all the time. There are a few little town areas, with basic utility NPCs, and one relatively short sidequest. Well, plus the Antz Colony passive sidequest.

        Now, allegedly FF XIII was an attempt to streamline the jRPG and cut out all the fat, but it felt very lacking. It felt empty, dull, pretty and flashy but with no substance. Dragon Quarter, on the other hand, is streamlined and constantly satisfying. To me, FF XIII felt like it gave me no reason to enjoy what I was doing - it never seemed like I was making any progress, or accomplishing anything useful. Dragon Quarter doesn’t have that problem, and for one reason or another it’s just an inherently more satisfying experience. It’s probably just a great combination of all the things it does well, against the things FF XIII did not. Anyway, I super enjoyed it.

        Also, I’m going to talk more about Catherine soon, but it’s going to get its own post. So wait for that.

——————————————————

        I read Neil Gaiman’s American Gods during my vacation to PEI, Robert Sawyer’s Wonder, and Patrick Rothfuss’s Name of the Wind. All were excellent, and I recommend them wholeheartedly. I’m working on finishing Steven Erikson’s The Crippled God, and I started George R. R. Martin’s A Dance With Dragons and Frank Herbert’s Dune. I know I should finish one book before starting two new ones (at the same time!) but when I’ve got two houses and a car (where I’ve spent a lot of time lately) I need to have something to read all the time. Erikson is doing his thing, and I happen to love it. The HBO adaptation of Game of Thrones - which I haven’t mentioned yet, so know this: I love it, go watch it! - has changed my view of Martin’s work, and it’s better for it. Peter Dinklage’s voice behind Tyrion’s lines is just great. As for Dune, I’m enjoying it so far, but I’ll get back to you when I finish it.

——————————————————

        I’m probably forgetting plenty of stuff, but I can’t really call to mind everything I’ve done recently. Maybe I’ve already posted about the books I read, too? I didn’t think I said much about my vacation because it would be boring to tell you about how I hung out with my friends. I’ve been catching up on things in my bookmarks and Read It Later lists, which is nice, but many of them weren’t quite worth posting about. I haven’t been working on my Grand Quest To Finish All The Final Fantasies, but whatever. Although, I did read The Final Fantasy VII Letters and alongside the Final Fantasy Things tumblr, it’s got me feeling better about the vast amounts of time I’ve spent on this. There’s a certain sense of beautiful community behind these jokes, and I kind of don’t regret spending 50-100 hours on each of these games. Maybe it isn’t time perfectly spent, but spent well enough. I can live with that.

Ok, normally I don’t care about these things, and I’ll try not to reblog them again. But I’m enjoying the hell out of them, and I should be allowed to do that after wasting weeks of my life on this series. I am the guy who does this (save multiple...

Ok, normally I don’t care about these things, and I’ll try not to reblog them again. But I’m enjoying the hell out of them, and I should be allowed to do that after wasting weeks of my life on this series. I am the guy who does this (save multiple times, to make sure, you know), and gets all the other jokes in their posts. I should make friends with people who are impressed by that, rather than depressed about it…

        The only downside to this tumblr is that they post WAY TOO OFTEN. 300 posts in the month of June alone. Screw off, man! Ten posts per day? July had a more manageable four posts per day, but even so. I may have to ditch them if they stop being funny and post way, way too many of them.

edit:

“now it’s time we fight like men! and ladies! and ladies who dress like men!”

master list, fastest way to read them if you’re interested

The Catherine & Cheating Saga, Pt 34

remnomicon:

lamattgrind:

Part 2 of my post from yesterday. If you haven’t read it, this won’t make as much sense. I said that I would write about “how I see love, why I say that Brittany “cheated” on me with an emphasis on the quotation marks, and why I have no problem with it.” Read on if you’re interested, and if not, you probably hate me by now. Sorry!

……

NOTE: THIS IS UNEDITED AND MAY BE OFFENSIVE AND/OR POORLY WRITTEN


Okay, I’ll admit that I still check your tumblrs and although I’m trying to keep a low profile… I really have to reply to this.
I guess this is partly because I don’t like your point of view but mostly because it’s just an interesting subject.

Hmmm, where should I start?

Well here’s something, it’s pathetic to be selfless.
I mean this and if you don’t already know why, you should by the time I’ve finished explaining myself.

You’re losing if you’re being selfless, you’re worse off, you care more than they do, etc.
I’ve never really had a good relationship that involved me being selfless, and by the looks of it, neither have you.

A relationship is more like a mutual agreement; you have something to offer them, they have something to offer you. This isn’t love, this is just my definition of a relationship.

Now, if you’re being selfless in a relationship, guess what? You’re losing, you’re with them because you love them, not because of what you can get from them.
You need that person to feel the same way about you for you to be on even ground.

A good relationship is a balanced one.
All in moderation.

Here’s where it gets complicated.
Love is a fickle and difficult thing, it’s difficult to control and it usually has awful timing. To put it simply, love is a mess.
You don’t want to take love lightly because it’ll bite on you on the arse as soon as you throw it off balance.

This is why you can’t be selfless, the most emotionally invested will be the most hurt by the end of it. Selflessness is the path to self destruction.

(I’ll write more on this if you ask me to.)

This is the part that sickens me. The fact that you could accept being cheated on, the fact that you’d let this shit happen to you.
I really wonder if you have any pride at all, you never seem to show any backbone and that’s one of the reasons why I never particularly made an effort to talk to you.

Y’know what? I don’t think I can talk about this subject without getting biased or angry. I guess I’ll write more (if you want to see it) when I can be sensible about it.

The difference here is that you’re looking at relationships as something game theory calls “zero sum” - in order for one person to gain, another person has to lose. Wikipedia’s example is cutting a cake - if one person gets a larger piece, then someone else gets a smaller piece. On the other hand, I see it as a “nonzero sum” situation - essentially a win/win situation. If I say something nice to cheer up a friend, I haven’t lost anything by giving them a bit of happiness. Which sounds dumb because you can’t give happiness but shut up. Anyway, now that I’ve introduced the idea of nonzero sum situations…

        What, exactly, do you lose by helping someone? You say that as if it’s a totally obvious conclusion. And caring about someone more than they care about you is only a problem if there’s a massive difference (i.e. they hardly care about you, while you’re under the impression that they are the love of your life) or you think that caring about someone entitles you to get something out of it. The thing is, whether you’re friends or more than that, having a good relationship with someone probably makes your life better. You enjoy talking to them online, or hanging out, or whatever. So you’re getting something out of the deal by default.

        Not to mention you aren’t entitled to anything. You don’t “deserve” to have someone love you, or stay in a relationship with you. You earn that. They could leave at any moment, so don’t take them for granted. They probably won’t, but so what? You shouldn’t treat someone badly under the assumption that you can make up for it later.

        There’s a fundamental problem here in that you say all of these things as if a relationship has to be zero sum. It doesn’t. I’ve become friends with Vael over the past two years, and not only has it not cost me anything to have great conversations with him, we’re both better off for it. Why would a romantic relationship be any different?

—————————————————————-

        It needs to be said that love isn’t binary - you’re not 0: in love and then suddenly 1: in love. When you kind of like someone, you definitely shouldn’t place their happiness above your own yet. When you’re starting to love them a little, you should think twice before doing something that would hurt them. Then when you love them a lot, you’re really, truly in love, that’s when you should be selfless. If you’ve come that far, they probably feel the same way. Ideally, they’d treat you equally well.

        If it’s a romantic relationship, and you break up, then whoever made that choice probably has good reason for doing so. A lot of the time, the other person probably still cares about them, and is naturally pretty hurt by that. But then, if your feelings for each other were mutual, why would you be breaking up? Of course the person who still cares will be hurt. So I don’t think it’s right to judge the end of a relationship the way you have. Alternatively, you’re judging entire relationships based on how they end, which is equally wrong.

—————————————————————-

        Two things that should be disgusting to anyone with a heart: basing a relationship on what you can get from someone, and basing a relationship on the need to possess. Granted, we all have acquaintances we only talk to when we need notes for a class we skipped missed, and other small things like that. I’d understand if people have a problem with being used that way - because, yeah, if you’re that person then you’re being used. But I’m not going to get worked up over something like that. Now, if someone only talks to you when they want to borrow large amounts of money, should you be ok with that? No, definitely not. But that’s different from giving someone your notes, or only being asked to hang out in specific situations.

        The second, then - the desire to possess. This is supreme selfishness, and it’s something a lot of people wind up in without realizing it. Love isn’t based on the desire to possess someone as an object, for them to be yours, and yours alone. Are you upset that your partner is leaving you because you care about them and think they’d be happier if you were together? Or are you upset because you’ve lost a thing that is yours and it makes you happy, which is what really matters? It’s one thing to be hurt, because something that made you happy is gone. It’s another thing to want it back only because it made you happy. When your happiness makes someone else unhappy, that’s a zero sum situation, and you should generally feel bad about that. If it’s someone you care about (or think you care about), you should feel especially bad about it, and doing so is proof that you care.

        So I ask you, what would having pride have done to change my situation? Should I have been proud to possess such a great thing, one that makes me happy all the time? Should I have been proud to have a girlfriend, simply because I did good things for her and her gratitude was confused for love? I’m proud to have done the right thing, even though it hurt. I’m proud that we managed to work things out in the end. I’m proud that I had the strength to pull through it all. I’m proud of the things that I can do, the good fortune I’ve had to lead the life I have, and the relationships I’ve forged along the way.

        I have enough of a spine to stand by what I believe, but not so much that I become a massive, bony dick who stands stubbornly by things that are proven wrong, and insults others because they disagree and not because they deserve such unkind words. It would sicken me to see someone act like that, and I could never live with myself if I were to act that way. Luckily, then, those kinds of people tend to be unaware of their true nature. I can only hope that someone would show me the truth, if I became so despicable.

3R·Source: lamattgrind

Love Should Be Selfless, and Thoughts on Cheating

Part 2 of my post from yesterday. If you haven’t read it, this won’t make as much sense. I said that I would write about “how I see love, why I say that Brittany "cheated” on me with an emphasis on the quotation marks, and why I have no problem with it.“ Read on if you’re interested, and if not, you probably hate me by now. Sorry!

        I think the ideal form of love is selfless. If you really, truly love someone, then you should want them to be as happy as possible. If being in love requires you to get something out of it, then you don’t love them as much as you think you do. If I had forced Brittany to stay away from this guy, because I really did think that being with her was the only way I could be happy, that wouldn’t have been love. Or, at least, it would have been showing that I loved myself the most, and cared more about my happiness than hers. I let her go because I knew that if it worked out, she would be happier with him than she ever would be with me. We might have been content together, but because she didn’t truly love me, it wouldn’t be a perfect, happily-ever-after kind of thing.

        This is mainly a romantic thing, because it’s not like you ever formally agree to spend the rest of your life with your closest friends. Still, when you care about someone a lot, you should be more interested in what you can do for them than what they can do for you. Since they (hopefully) care about you the same way, they’ll take care of you just as selflessly. And everyone wins.

        So, as for infidelity specifically, I should start by saying that I wouldn’t ever do something like that to begin with. The fact that I could accept it from my partner doesn’t mean that I condone it. To me, the worst thing about a one-night stand would be if it was kept a secret - that’s a betrayal of trust, which hurts. Who cares about the sex at that point? If they come clean right away and don’t make a habit of it, it’s forgivable. And could you really blame someone if they fell in love with someone else? It sucks, but sometimes people just click. Again, if they keep it a secret and start seeing someone else, that’s intentional and wrong. But it’s love, and if they’d be happier that way, let them go and move on. I do think that we can be monogamous with the right partners, and I’m willing to forgive a lot. And, yeah, I’m tough enough to let someone go so they can be happy. It’s hard to appreciate right away, but I think it’s the best decision to make.

        It never really bothered me that much that Brittany was with this other guy, that she had feelings for him, and so on. It was never a secret - she asked for my permission repeatedly, and I gave it every time, with the one condition being that she not do anything behind my back. If she’d done all of this and pretended our relationship was fine until the day that we broke up, I would have been infinitely more hurt. I would have no issues telling people that she cheated on me. If I were to say that now, it would make it seem like I was victimized - when in reality I personally encouraged her to go after this guy. Yeah, we were "officially” together while all of this was going on, but that really doesn’t matter. She didn’t want to hurt me, but at the same time, she was falling in love with this guy and going back to me would have been impossible. I can’t honestly say “no, you should stop yourself from falling in love, and also you should stay in a relationship where you are content rather than search for one where you are truly happy.” Even if someone could do that, why would they? And why would you want them to?

        Anyway, now you probably understand better why neither of us is honestly worried about old feelings coming back. The people who were worried about that, they don’t know this stuff - they just know that we dated in the past and now I’m offering her a place to stay. I’m still surprised that I’ve never posted about this before, but now I have and now you know! It’s probably not worth the effort to explain all of this to people so that they can understand why we could live together and not consider being more than friends. But the people who know we were together ought to know why we broke up, and not just that we did.

        I mean, man. How did I not write about this before? Still amazed by that.

Catherine, and Some Personal History

I’ve been thinking for the past week about what different people get from reading my tumblr. Random internet strangers probably just read the posts about things they’re interested in. People who know me well will get to know me better. But for people who don’t know me yet, it’s not a perfect window into my life - there are a lot of things that don’t come across all that well in text. I post about the things that interest me, and I post a lot of information about my life, but not so much about more abstract things - what I believe in, what kind of person I am, and so on. There’s not much point in simply telling you those things. because there would be nothing to back it up, and even if you accept that I’m nice because I said so, it wouldn’t really leave much of an impression on you. Trying to show you things like that with words is tough, but I’ll think about it and work on a few drafts to give the internet at large a better idea of who I am.

        I started playing Catherine last night, and aside from being a pretty satisfying puzzle game (as long as you don’t get really stuck on a hard part), it’s an absolutely wonderful thing to experience. I’d be surprised if I got more than ten hours out of it, but the value of playing it can’t be measured in time spent playing. The basic gist is that you guide Vincent, a 32 year old underachiever, through the worst week of his life. First, his girlfriend of five years, Katherine, starts talking about marriage. Then he drinks a bit too much and has a one-night stand with a girl named Catherine. What happens from there depends on the player’s decisions, but it’s a really well-crafted experience.

        If you absolutely love puzzle games, there’s probably $60 worth of gameplay in there, but everyone else should play the game on easy and act as honestly as possible. It’ll get you thinking about what you would do in a given situation, and about relationships in general. Which is absolutely fantastic, and I’m so glad that this is a “mainstream” video game. I mean, ok, it’s not a AAA blockbuster release, but it’s not some budgetless, vague indie game either. It’s a game that deals with marriage, cheating, responsibility, the nature of relationships… It’s a work of art in every definition of the word.

        So I’ve been thinking a lot since I started playing it, and naturally one of the things I’ve been thinking about is infidelity. Apparently, I’ve actually never written about this before, which is surprising because of what happened between Brittany and I. It’s kind of an important detail, which makes it strange that I’ve never mentioned it. It also means I have to write about it now, in order to get into the stuff I want to say. Alright, so, here’s the quick and dirty version. When we were in 9th grade, Brittany got involved with a guy a year younger than her, and she was really serious about him. It ended badly, she did her best to get over it, and then in November of 10th grade we started dating again. In PEI, high school doesn’t start until 10th grade, so when we moved onto high school she didn’t really see the guy until the fall of 11th grade.  Before too long, despite having a girlfriend, he started flirting with her. She was wary of him because he proved to be a supreme asshole the first time, but I knew she was drawn to him in a way she’d never been drawn to me, and so I gave her permission to talk to him and braced for impact. Fast forward a few months, and by November things are very serious between them and we finally break up ten days before our anniversary.

        I don’t think I need to get into what happened between them after that, but suffice to say that he was actually worse than a supreme asshole. An uber asshole, if you will, the horrible embodiment of all the terrible things women expect from men. Meanwhile, I had encouraged my girlfriend - who I loved dearly, and who was at the time my one source of happiness - to leave me. In the end, her relationship with him made her reevaluate her feelings for me, and there ended the possibility of us getting back together. Understandably, our relationship became strained as things went on, and we spoke less and less often. Eventually it seemed like we couldn’t even manage to carry on a conversation. Considering she was my only close friend, the only person I thought I could share my secrets, doubts, and fears with, this was hard for me. I was incredibly lonely, and of course I spoke occasionally with my friends and family about this stuff, but it was this loneliness that led me to meet Vael and open up to him.

        What I realized, over time, was that I missed Brittany as my best friend far more than I missed her as my girlfriend. We went from speaking all day, every day to never speaking at all, and that alone was hard. Not having anyone to talk to about personal stuff was worse. I don’t remember the exact details of what happened, but at some point I must have told her this and asked if we could “just be friends.” Yeah, I said that, and I said it after we’d broken up. Delicious irony, if you can ignore my crying, desperately lonely 16-year-old-self long enough to laugh about it. Of course there were issues to work through, and of course I struggled with my feelings for her. After all that time, I couldn’t just snap my fingers and only think of her as a friend. But in the end, it all worked out, and now we’re friends and she’s living in my mom’s house. It’s been almost a week now, and it hasn’t been at all awkward for me (although I’ve been at my dad’s house this whole time). She doesn’t find it weird being there, and I assume being around me is no different than it was a month ago. Which is to say I haven’t asked about that, but maybe I should.

        SO OK NOW WE’RE BACK TO CATHERINE AND THE THINGS IT MADE ME THINK ABOUT. Now I can tell you how I see love, why I say that Brittany “cheated” on me with an emphasis on the quotation marks, and why I have no problem with it. Except that when I say now, I actually mean tomorrow, because this is really long. And the chances of people reading it all probably increase when it’s split up. So, that post will go up tomorrow morning, and I hope you all enjoy it!

#AltDev Design links

Just a couple of links to share today as I try to clean out my bookmarks a bit. They’re #AltDevBlog posts about the practical parts of actually being a game designer, and not just a programmer who kind of designs or a designer who just throws things together. They also have a number of great comments by industry folk; Mike Birkhead in particular has some great comments, so at least read his if you choose to ignore the rest of the comments.

Respecting Design tackles the issue of everyone thinking they know how to design a game. You don’t know how to design a game just because you’ve played a few games. “No one in their right mind opens up the code depot, alters files at random, and then, when rightfully questioned on their sanity, say in defense, "Hey, everyone’s code is valid man”. So why is it ok for game design?“ Reading this made me realize that, yeah, I don’t know shit about being a game designer. I can read all the blog posts I want, but that doesn’t mean I know anything useful. Not that I thought I was a game designer, mind you, just that I thought I was learning about it. It would probably be more accurate to say that I was learning around it, if that makes any sense. Circling the perimeter without ever entering it.

Design Docs Debate is less of a debate and more a collection of interesting links in the comment thread and a few good comments - specifically, Slone’s and Mike Birkhead’s. It sounds to me like the original poster is in a program where they got really anal about the requirements - but then I remember hating essay outlines in tenth grade, too. From the sounds of things, it seems like a good design document is pretty similar to a good outline (for an essay, or a short story, or even a novel) - you can go without to a certain degree, if you’re ok ending up with a lesser result because of it. Being able to create a good one is one of the things you just end up doing when you want to produce better results, because if you sit down without a plan, your final product will be nothing like what you envisioned.

Random thought - ever notice how the "blog post” has supplanted the essay? Two hundred years ago you could be an “essayist,” someone who writes essays. Now you’re just a blogger, and your wonderful essays are just “posts” like any other. I’m going to use the term essay, so there. Lead by example, right?

[Click the image to go to Funimation’s page to stream all 64 episodes of Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood subbed, and… four episodes dubbed]
I can’t show you many awesome scenes from FMA Brotherhood without spoiling things for you, but I can show you...

[Click the image to go to Funimation’s page to stream all 64 episodes of Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood subbed, and… four episodes dubbed]

I can’t show you many awesome scenes from FMA Brotherhood without spoiling things for you, but I can show you this video. It’s a pre-requisite for reading the rest of this post.

        Ok, are you done watching it? Does the phrase “muscles increase by thousandfold” now mean something to you? If not, you’re lying. Go back and watch the video!

        Ok, now we can talk about how FMA Brotherhood is literally my favourite anime now. Granted, there are a lot of shows I haven’t gotten around to watching yet (Code Geass, Ergo Proxy, Ghost in the Shell, Neon Genesis Evangelion, Gurren Lagann, Welcome to the NHK, Darker than Black - and that’s just the stuff on my harddrive) but as of right now Brotherhood stands above even Baccano! and Durarara!! as the first anime I’d recommend. The action scenes are fantastically animated, and watching them in 1080p on a big TV would probably be jaw-droppingly amazing. The intrigue is surprisingly deep, and there’s some pretty cool moments of subterfuge too. There’s a bit of emotional drama, but having watched the first series it didn’t really break my heart. Mainly, though, this is the best action (shonen) show I’ve seen - it’s the pure, distilled spark of the ideal version of something like Naruto or Bleach. You might watch Bleach or Naruto for a while, and think there’s something really special underneath all the filler and crap, but then you keep watching and it never shows up. Brotherhood is that, that something special, all the time.

        Actually, wait, I guess I should go back to the beginning. So, Fullmetal Alchemist is a manga started in 2001 that spawned an anime adaptation in 2003. However, because the manga wasn’t finished yet, the 2003 anime had a separate story from the manga and, having watched both, it wasn’t nearly as good as the manga’s story. Then they announced a new version of the anime, called FMA: Brotherhood that would follow the story of the manga from start to finish. And it was good.

        The world of Fullmetal Alchemist is a sort of alternate reality version of 20th century Europe - in fact, based on dates seen in the show, the action occurs throughout 1914 and the spring of 1915. Their geography doesn’t mirror real world geography, though, with most of the action occurring in the militaristic nation of Amestris. Anyway, the main difference is that in their world, alchemy - the lead into gold, search for eternal life kind - is possible. It’s not common, but it plays a large part in the military strategy of Amestris. The most prominent alchemists join the military, to further their research and gain greater freedom. In exchange, they become tools of the military - if the military tells a State Alchemist to use their abilities for combat, they don’t have much of a choice.

        The story follows one State Alchemist, Edward Elric, and his younger brother Alphonse. At the (chronological) start of the series, the young Elric brothers research human transmutation in an attempt to bring their deceased mother back from the dead. After gathering all the necessary base ingredients, carbon and water and so on, they try to create a human being and bring their mother’s soul back to it. However, following a version of the Law of Conversation of Mass, it’s impossible to simply create a soul out of nothing and create life where there was none. And so, Alphonse is used as a catalyst in the transmutation, along with Ed’s left leg. Making matters worse, the creation is nothing like their mother at all - it’s a confused jumble of bones and flesh that moans in agony. In an attempt to bring his brother back, Ed sacrifices his right arm to bind Al’s soul into a large suit of armour. After that, the series follows the two brothers as they search for the Philosopher’s Stone so that they can regain their original bodies.

        That’s a lot easier said than done, but I don’t want to get into the story any more than that because I really suggest that you watch it. Brotherhood doesn’t require previous knowledge of the series, and it’s just plain fantastic. The world of the series is wonderful and well-thought out, with the best moments being the ones that just make sense following the established “science”. Do yourself a favour and watch it in the highest quality you can, and if you like it, look around for a cheap copy of the blu-rays (or DVDs if you must, but a blu-ray player is like $100 these days and the quality is phenomenal).

Further thoughts about game reviews

A while back I posted about game review scores, and in the mean time, Extra Credits has done an episode about game reviews and one of Metacritic’s co-founders had stuff to say. Then I wrote a lengthy post that was mainly about how I rented inFamous 2 and was disappointed enough in its sameness to stop playing after only a few hours and never want to touch it again. I knew it was terrible and chose not to post it, and then the article about Metacritic was posted, so now I’m starting over and actually being relevant.

        While it makes sense that most of the games we play are pretty damn awesome and could rightfully be given an 8 or 9 out of 10, I almost think it’s unfair to compare them to games nobody in their right mind will review. Compared to Carnival Extravangaza Mini-Game-Collection-for-the-Wii DX, inFamous 2 is probably the greatest game ever created. So, fine, there are games that are absolutely terrible and deserve low scores and others that are “average”, somewhere in between shit and gold, that deserve middle scores. But why shouldn’t games be reviewed in relation to each other? Why shouldn’t you give an 8/10 game like inFamous 2 a score of 6/10 as an action-adventure title (or whatever you want to call it)? Why does Assassin’s Creed Brotherhood - which I’ll admit I enjoyed the tiniest bit more than AC II, and it does have the benefit of its actually worthwhile multiplayer mode - get a high score despite being almost the same as last year’s game?

        I know that people’s jobs depend on review scores, and I know that tons of people (hopefully) worked really hard on these games. But a reviewer has every right to say that it’s nothing you haven’t seen before, and you may as well go pick up last year’s Game X for half the price because it was marginally better. That’s something I’ve seen before in film and novel reviews, though it’s not like I read a huge amount of them. It makes more sense for more knowledgeable readers, who will know exactly what you mean if you say “it’s like X, if they took out the interesting characters” because they’ve played/watched/read X already. Meanwhile, less knowledgeable readers get a good recommendation and a better idea of what they’re getting into.

        I know it’s uncouth to compare games to… well, anything else, because we’re all tired of being in the shadow of other mediums. But criticism for other mediums is very well established, and most game reviewers don’t deserve the title of “game critic.” They can be useful in their own ways, but I feel that reviews (with an occasional splash of critique) are naturally inferior to critiques (with an occasional splash of review). How many war films have been released recently that have nothing new or interesting to offer? Not many, because there’s more to film making than making an easy profit.

        And how many military shooters have been released that have nothing new or interesting to offer? Too many, because there’s little more influential in mainstream game development than the need to make a profit.

Effective advertisement!!!!!!!!!!!

I have received an offer, in my e-mail inbox, that is simply so good that it must be true. After all, not only did they send me an e-mail, they also offered a Skype account to contact should I wish to further discuss this wonderful advertising opportunity! I will share the message with you, because I believe that it is just so fantastic that such effective advertising opportunities are available thanks to modern technology.

———————————————————

Hi!

We want to offer you a new way of advertisement!

If you want to promote your business to the next rate or to increase useful traffic to your web-site,

If you want to make new friends or find your love,

If you want to realize something, such as a car or a house, or buy something,

Then this offer is just for you!

We own a huge number of databases, we can make any sample of recipients.
For example, country and city of residence, hobbies, profession, post, income, height, eye color and even sexual preferences!

We process all orders as soon as possible!
We are people who have no limits

Prices:

All advertising project that you want to will be beginning with  $ 500 we appreciate our time.
Also there is a system of bonuses and the best offers for all your needs!

Please write us at [withheld] or Skype [withheld]

———————————————————

There is a system of bonuses, and the best offers for all your needs. They are people who have no limits - do you wish to realize a house, or find your love? They can do all that and more, with this wonderful form of effective advertising and their huge amount of databases.

The world is such a wonderful place!

net slum: re: Demi4

vael:

lamattgrind:

“I’m really bad at reading fantasy”, and we’re all bad at “reading” games

I don’t think that the mark of a good author is to mask their symbolism to the point where people like you and the author of that article cannot see the meaning. I definitely think it’s a common…

The only way to make it obvious would be to have a character come out and explain it - the point of symbolism is that you’re using a symbol to convey something other than its literal meaning. I think that, in writing at least, symbolism is easier to pick up on than in something visual like a graphic novel or a film - look at the people analyzing Watchmen for the tiny things hidden in the corner of some panel or whatever. Which, from my understanding, was intentional on the part of the creators, but even so. At least with a novel, stopping to think about whether it might be symbolic is usually all you need to do. Direwolf is the sigil of the Starks, stag is the sigil of the Baratheons, and they find a direwolf killed by a stag - all the pieces are there, you just need to think about it.

        It’s harder when you’re dealing with recurring themes or symbols that readers/academics notice, despite the author never intending them to mean anything. The accepted wisdom in critical analysis is that it’s perfectly valid to find meaning in something the author never intended, but that also means you have to do a lot of work to make sense out of it. Hence why they look for them to show how smart they are. In that case, the reason it’s so “well hidden” is that it wasn’t meant to be found.

        Getting back to your point about what makes an author good, I think there are a lot of different things they could be good at. Some authors are really great at writing (I hope the distinction makes sense, it’s the easiest way to say this), and they know just the right words to use and know when to follow the rules and when to break them. Others, like George R. R. Martin, are incredibly meticulous in their planning and know from the beginning how they’re going to set up everything that follows. Steven Erikson and Martin both do a fantastic job of playing with point of view, making good use of dramatic irony and… reverse dramatic irony? Leaving the reader guessing at what a character knows and their motivations, giving them bits and pieces of information as other characters discover the truth.

        In short, I’d say you could be a great author and a terrible writer, which makes me feel less guilty about some of the books I’ve read. Any story that takes several thousand pages to relate is bound to have issues, but they’ve got their strengths too. I realize this is completely tangential to what you posted, but I’d never thought of it this way until typing it just now - I felt like I shouldn’t defend an author because of their bad writing, despite enjoying their books overall. Well, good. Now we’ve all learned something!