I said I’d stop posting music because of Last.fm, but I’m still seriously debating whether or not to post a lot of what I’ve got floating around in my drafts. So, in the mean time, have a post about a fairly popular band. Lunar Sanctum by Kamelot, from their 1999 album The Fourth Legacy.
I really love the chorus, and the lyrics are great as well:
there’s a place where I want to hide
with a view to a shallow moon
there’s a star in my cosmic mind
that reminds me of you
Full song’s lyrics here, through Dark Lyrics as per my tradition.
And hey, actually listen to this one! If you’ve never heard of Kamelot, actually stop and listen for a few minutes. I know how many followers I have, and I see my audio posts only getting three plays!
Speaking of limited interests, if you keep hoping for wonderful Final Fantasy related stuff from me, sorry ‘bout that. I’m carrying FF VI and my DS with me, but never playing it. And if you don’t like philosophy/don’t wish you were majoring in cognitive science, I’m very, very sorry. You’re about to get pretty much a week worth of posts from me on the subject. As in, a many page long essay, but split up for somewhat easier reading.
I’m going to enjoy it, and I’ll feel like a smarty pants posting it, but you might see it them as pretentious pants. Like I said, very, very sorry. But sometimes I just can’t contain my excitement, and you know, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. I’ve read a few textbooks, so now I definitely know better than everyone else! Time to ramble on and illuminate the world! Except I’m going to write somewhat well and it’ll be good, I hope. Ideally, you should understand without needing prior knowledge.
Now, it’s back to work with me. Got a Python script to finish, a bit of light reading to do. Maybe I ought to work on the computers assignment, philosophy essay, and midterm I have next week. But, to be honest, things are more or less under control. Which is a really nice feeling.
I used to use Last.fm, and found it great for getting recommendations, but at some point it stopped scrobbling so I gave up on it for a few years. I found out a week ago that when you install scrobbler and create a new account, it reads your existing iTunes library playcounts, so I did that as fast as I possibly could. Now I’ve got this nice little profile that tells you all the music I listen to, including what I am listening to right this second, and I don’t have to keep posting individual songs.
Anyway, this is just a quick post while something else I wrote is being proofread by a handful of people. You’ll see that before too long. I’ve got a lot on my plate right now, maybe too much (time it takes to find two dozen research papers to read: a few hours, time it takes to read each paper: 1-2 hours, and get back to me in a week), but I’m getting back into School Mode. In a couple of weeks, we’ll be starting to run participants for a few experiments at the Language and Brain Lab, so I get to be an assistant for that! Exciting stuff.
Five years ago (minus a month and 9 days) I was sitting in front of our “big screen” 36" CRT TV with my launch day PS3 and a copy of Insomniac’s first Resistance game. I ran around, shot aliens in the face, and I probably had fun doing it. I think I tried to run around and find all the hidden documents for a little while, and even ventured online for a couple hours of multiplayer. Too long ago to remember much more though.
Roughly three years ago, Resistance 2 came out, and I liked it well enough too. Convinced a few friends to buy it so we could play co-op online… but I never played it with them. Oops. I didn’t really mind the changes from the first game (regenerating health, no weapon wheel), but I was really getting into the story. What’s up with the Cloven? What are the Chimera? I was under the impression that there were more backstory documents in the multiplayer, so I really wanted to get those, but my interest waned pretty quickly.
A month ago now, Resistance 3 came out, and I knew I didn’t really care. But hey, I’m already two games in, I have to know what comes next, right? So I bought it a couple weeks ago. Played my way up to chapter 17 (of 20) over the course of ~8 hours or so. And I didn’t enjoy it in the slightest. As far as the gameplay goes, the best ideas it has are to bring back health packs and the weapon wheel. There’s nothing to see here, folks. You’ve got scripted sequences where it seems like you might die, but you obviously won’t. You’ve got arena areas with just the right amount of ammo and health to get you through safely. You’ve got some “quirky” weapons like the one that freezes dudes, and the one that mutates dudes, but the end result is that the other dudes die and you don’t.
I kept going, looking for the fun, hoping it might be right around the corner. But there was no fun to be found anywhere in my $60 game. Trade-in value for the game is down to $25, but of course that’s in-store credit. I usually think of trading in a game along the same lines as throwing it out, and I was that frustrated with the game that I almost considered it. But not for half of what I paid for it, and conditional on the fact that I want to spend that money on another game. So I’ll just keep it, and set it aside in the Hall of Shame section of my shelf.
The thing is, I’m not sure if Resistance 3 is just an ok game, or whether I’m bored with shooters in general. Or maybe it’s not even shooters - maybe I’m just done with “Hollywood games.” I want Prince of Persia: Sands of Time, where you can actually fail the platforming sequences. I want Demon’s Souls, where rocks fall down and kill you, instead of falling around you to create the illusion of action. I want to be legitimately afraid because my character is weak and the enemies are strong, because a dark room with some scary noises isn’t going to cut it. I want a narrative that gives me just enough information to get engaged, but always has bigger mysteries to solve. I want characters that are worth caring about. And I don’t need every game to have all of these things - one or two of them, done well enough, can carry a whole game.
But I’m done throwing away sixty bucks on games with nothing to offer. I’ve got better things to do with my time and money. I can’t see any shooters coming out any time soon that I have any interest in buying, and I’m going to think a bit harder before I jump on something like the new Assassin’s Creed or FF XIII-2. In the mean time, stuff like Serious Sam: The Random Encounter is far more interesting to me than all of the big releases coming out this year.
It’s not totally clear how this is going to work on non-backwards compatible PS3s, because they haven’t been totally specific about the details yet. Really, all I’ve found so far is that they’re starting with five games, for $10 each, which is probably at least 50% cheaper than getting them on eBay. I probably paid at least $20 for the copies I bought of, uh, every single one of these games in the past. Some (Grim Grimoire, God Hand, Maximo) I’ve sold in the intervening years because I knew I’d never play them, but don’t let that stop you from picking them up.
Ring of Red is probably the one you’ve never heard of, so here’s a gameplay video. The next five minutes of that shows you the combat - outside of the battles, it’s a strategy RPG. I really enjoy the game conceptually, though I generally fail at actually playing it.
Also, Kingdom Hearts 3D is probably going to be the game that sells me a 3DS. First, because I’m kind of a whore for Square-Enix - I kiiiiind of buy just about every game they release, and when I bought a PSP, I did it so I could play 6 Squeenix games and 2 others. Second, because I played The World Ends With You before school, during lunch, and after school every day for many months.
The demo for KH 3D at the Tokyo Game Show had Neku popping in to demand that Sora team up with him to play the Reaper’s Game.
There goes $200, basically.
I also can’t help but want a PS Vita. I mean, I have a PSP now, I know what that’s like. And the Vita does that, but it will play my PS2 games, and possibly PS3 games? And I can share that stuff between the console and the handheld and switch between them. And it’ll have the Facebooks and stuff. The moral of the story is, that’s some sexy technology for $250. I don’t know when there will be games I want to play on the system, but I still want it.
No, I can’t afford any of this. I shouldn’t have bought Resistance 3… but I did. I shouldn’t have spent $35 on Deus Ex. In fact, I shouldn’t have bought a PSP, since that’s easily like $300-400 I’ve spent over the last six months, not to mention ~150 hours of playtime over the summer. And twice that for my brother, at least.
But I DON’T regret pre-ordering Dark Souls - which comes out tomorrow! And I won’t play it until Christmas! It’s going to be great. Definitely getting my money’s worth out of it.
S'been two weeks since I last posted something, and I’m really sorry ‘bout that. See, this whole time I’ve been planning a big post, but I haven’t been willing to sit down and work on it and wound up deciding it was too much reading for too little benefit. I’ll try to salvage it sometime soon, with as little text as I can get away with. Realistically, sharing my introspective monologues doesn’t benefit anyone other than me, and I figure if I’m going to be selfish, I may as well be quick about it.
Instead, I’ve got a Lifehacker post about Facebook that links into my post from a few weeks ago about Google collecting your information. Basically, some people found out that Facebook will track your browsing information and stuff, attached to your Facebook account, even after you’ve logged out. To deal with it, you have a few options: a list to load into AdBlock Plus, a Chrome extension just for Facebook, or a more radical option - the Disconnect extension for Chrome and Firefox.This has the added benefit of disconnecting you from more than just Facebook - it’ll hide you from Google, Twitter, and everyone else. When it turns off certain captcha services, Gmail, and other useful stuff, you can just toggle it off I think.
So there you go. Now you can opt-out, if you want. Seems fair to me.
edit: Oh and my Final Fantasy Thing was posted! I laughed really hard when this line came up, it’s the perfect hilarious SNES villain line. FF VII and VIII went all serious, but V (at least, the FF V Advance translation) has just completely absurd moments like this. You’ve got a villain who is, no joke, a tree that got really angry and decided to destwoy evewyfing.
“I turned myself into a tiny splinter, waiting for just this moment!”
So, I told myself I wouldn’t pull “Condescending Second-Year Science Kid” in my PSYC1001 class. BUT. Butbutbutbutbut.
The first-years on WebCT are so annoying.
“You know guys, it’s not high school anymore! We have to step up our game!”
Step up your game? He gave you 20 pages of reading, sweetie. Come on.
If my PSYC 1001 course is any indication: Wait for the deluge of messages from people asking for notes. “My computer got a virus and crashed so I like lost everything”, or “I got super sick for the last six weeks and since the midterm is coming up…” or “Somebody stole my laptop!” Sometimes they just post on the message boards, but other times they take the slightly more subtle route and just send a message to everyone in the class roster. Often, they’ll post on someone else’s topic and say “can I get the notes too plz”, or not include any way to actually send them the notes.
It’s awesome because I know the names of a few people who were too dumb to keep checking my website even after I sent it to them once. And some of them are in my classes this year. Good luck out there, you trooper, you. Glad I could give you notes for three of our five classes. Hope you know how to write an essay by now.
Sarah Saturday by The Bouncing Souls, from their album The Gold Record. It came up on shuffle while I was driving to work the other day, and it was great. Really enjoy listening to these guys.
Lyrics here, if you care!
Ars Technica wrote a great piece you should really read about game developers leaving the AAA industry to make it on their own. Inside, they mentioned a game called Card Hunter, which is being funded by the co-founder of Irrational Games - the guys who made System Shock 2 and Bioshock. I looked it up, and found out it’s being worked on by other people you might have heard of. Farbs makes some pretty cool games, and I actually bought into the Captain Forever series when the first game was in beta. On a slightly more famous note, does the name Richard Garfield ring any bells?
There’s no definite release date yet, but it seems pretty fascinating. They’ve got a couple of developer diaries talking about deck building in the game: one here, and another here. I pretty much like everything about this game, but the deck building is particularly interesting. Rather than adding specific cards, you equip items, which give you a specific “suite” of cards. Should make for some good strategy.
I guess I probably shouldn’t post about a game that isn’t out yet. But I’m eagerly awaiting its release, and I think some of you might be interested too. After all, you probably played Magic years ago. Remember the good times? Yeah, me too. Card Hunter will probably have more good times! Play it with me when it comes out!
Classes start again tomorrow, so I thought I’d post my class schedule. I’ve already posted about which classes I’m taking, so available/busy information should be good enough. This is a public link, indexed for Google searches (required in order to have a public calendar, sadly), but I guess I can give you - specifically, you, because you’re my favourite reader - the private link if you absolutely must know where I am and what I’m doing at all times.
If we ever want to organize group MMO playing or anything like that, Google Calendar is a good tool for it. It handles multiple calendars pretty well, and you just have to look for an open spot between everybody’s schedules.
First of all, this XKCD comic will make you just as good as I am at helping you figure out how to do things I have no idea how to do, like wrapping text in Photoshop. Second of all, the article this post’s title links to will actually make you better than I am (well, until I start consulting that chart) at correcting wireless internet problems.
Although you might want to download the .pdf version, available below the “Related Articles” section, so you can consult it when your internet isn’t working.
Work It Out by Beat Crusaders, from their album Popdod.
I think it speaks for itself.
As I mentioned a couple of weeks ago, and have mentioned far too many times to my friends, I got an Android phone recently. It’s working beautifully, by the way - CyanogenMod 7 is far better than the version of Android 1.5 that came with the phone, and LauncherPro is a whole lot faster than CM’s default launcher ADW. Despite the pretty weak hardware, things run pretty well, though I can’t play many games beyond Game Dev Story. But do I really need anything else…?
As I was setting up my new phone, I gleefully entered contact info to Google’s servers - allowing me to get everything back if I flash a new ROM, or even buy a new phone - I realized just how much data I was handing over. Am I ok with letting Google know who my friends and family are? For that matter, are my friends and family ok with it? Should I enter their addresses for my own convenience, or would that be a breach of their privacy? Would I start getting ads in Gmail for flights to New Brunswick around Christmas time to visit family, and to PEI in the spring to visit friends? I’m already telling Google which contacts send me e-mails important enough to notify me about. When I’m busy because of class or meetings, and for that matter, where they are. Between my phone’s GPS and cell phone tower information, they can categorize the places I spend most of my time as “Home.” When I post to Facebook from my phone, it’s probably going to say “Posted from Facebook Mobile near Carleton University.”
A few days later, Lifehacker linked to an article declaring that “Google wants to own your online identity.” Eric Schmidt, formerly CEO of Google, declared that Google+ was built primarily as an “identity service,” and that they planned to build further services based on that information. The article quotes some guy who summed the situation up pretty well: who did Google build this for - you, or them? And maybe it’s worth asking that same question about everything else they do. After all, they certainly don’t make money by providing an awesome alternative to calendar software, or Google Analytics, or a web browser, or their Public DNS service. No, as the GigaOM article reminds us, Google makes money through advertising. And advertising gets easier and easier the more information they can get about their potential customers.
And yet, this doesn’t really bother me. So long as they sell advertisements, but keep the data to themselves, I don’t really mind. Unless you’re a supar haxxor, nothing you do on the internet is ever completely hidden. Your ISP logs everything, if they’re ever inclined to take a look at your internet usage. Any web-based e-mail service you use will have access to your data that way, and every site you visit probably leaves three cookies in your browser’s cache. If Google collects that data from me and makes some money off of it, that’s more or less a fair trade for the services they offer. What would I do otherwise? Keep track of four different e-mail inboxes in Thunderbird? Use Rainlendar or a Thunderbird extension to manage my calendar, but be restricted to accessing it on one computer? Fact is, Google’s products are a whole lot better than similar software you might otherwise pay for, and somebody has to pay the engineers who create them.
I guess some people might prefer to pay with money rather than personal information. I’m not that worried about my imagined sense of privacy, though. The day hackers do to Google what they did to Sony, I’ll start worrying.
(Although, 1.5 games might be more accurate, since I’m about to finished the second I’ve just finished the second - of three - worlds in FF V, and after that, FF VI - see my previous post from May)
Sorry for the lack of real updates recently! Here’s part of the reason why: I’ve spent the last couple of weeks playing through FF VIII. Final play time was just short of 70 hours. Couldn’t be bothered to level up the characters outside my main party, or track down a couple of Level 7 Boss Cards, but other than that I did everything there was to do. Except play a no-level game and maximize my base stats using Devour/Boost items, but that’s for craz… dedicated fans. Yeah.
Anyway! I’m not 100% sure what I should say about it, seeing as the game is a dozen years old by now. I can say that I didn’t care in the slightest about Squall and Rinoa’s relationship - sorry, was there development there? Because it seemed like someone just flipped a switch, and off they went. The thing about the orphanage and the memory erosion of the GFs was pretty silly, but whatever. And what the hell is up with NORG…?
I admit, though, I have to really look for things to dislike about the game. I definitely had a lot of fun playing it, and the section with Squall commanding Balamb Garden into battle was awesome. Even though I selected “prepare for attack” first, since the game hinted you should ambush them, and later scolded me for not attacking first. But yeah, I never really appreciated the direction of these action-movie-esque scenes (being chased by the robot in Dollet, the fight between Gardens, or the reactor sequences in FF VII) as a kid, but now I’m impressed that the game manages to create a real sense of tension in jaded ole me. Not to mention things like Quistis’s declaration that “Seifer’s sentence was carried out in Galbadia,” and following Sephiroth’s trail through Shinra - the music and everything else just come together for an intense feeling of dread and foreboding.
I especially liked the way the game’s systems feed back into each other. If you’ve played Persona 3 and 4, much as I love the games, the social link stuff is more or less totally separated from the dungeon crawling stuff. But in FF VIII, everything has a useful purpose. I originally thought that Triple Triad would be dumb or a waste of time, but then I found out what you could get from the rare cards, and so I set out to collect them. The Cactus Thorns you collected a hundred of from hunting Cactuars turn into Hundred Thorns, which can teach some ability called “Return Damage” or be converted into other stuff. Point is, the game rewards you in a lot of ways, and that’s a smart decision. Also, super twinkable, delivering ultimate min/max joy. Final boss casts Meteor? Good thing I only take 20 damage from each hit!
Oh, I do want to mention the weird as hell part of the ending that comes right after you beat the final boss. It goes on for way too long, and it’s just… weird. If you’re ok with spoilers, watch the first 5 minutes of this video. I think they’re trying to make you think Squall was erased from existence? Not really sure whose bright idea that was.
To tell you the truth, I actually almost finished FF VIII when I was a kid (roughly age 7). I’d made my way to the fourth disc, and then… my dad saved over my file when he was playing later that night. HOW COULD YOU DO THIS TO MEEEEEEEEEEE?! I swore revenge, and retaliated by ripping up some of his old socks with scissors. And never touched FF VIII again, until now. Do you think I secretly have bonus nostalgia for the game, even though I’d forgotten everything about the game except the section with the robot in Dollet? It was like I was playing the game for the first time, but maybe somewhere in my mind I knew I’d been there before. Liek wif Squall and da GFs amirite? But yeah, now I’ve actually finished the game, and it only took me 70 hours to undo the effects of his save file confusion.
Thanks, Dad.
I know I’m two days late to the party, but who doesn’t like comics from The Oatmeal? Certainly not bears.
Geez, how hard is it to just get rid of people?
I don’t think I’ll ever be able to become what I want without erasing my past and getting people to let go, I just want to be myself.
Your past will always be a part of you, no matter how much you try to deny…
Oh, no, you certainly shouldn’t hold onto the past or grieve over things you can’t change - but neither should you deny that what you’ve done in the past has anything to do with you now. You have to accept it, because you can’t change it. Whether you want “the good times” back, or wish you’d done things differently, it’s just two sides of the same coin. Either way, you haven’t made peace with your past. It’s a foundation for the future - what kind of a house has no foundation? You can’t just rip it all out when you decide you don’t like it.
You won’t make the same mistakes again? Well, that’s why your past is important. It’s what made you who you are. If you’ve decided to change, that’s because of your past, and that decision couldn’t exist independent of what you did and how you felt about the results. I don’t believe people should be held responsible for things that they’ve done in the distant past, as long as they aren’t still doing those same things. What’s done is done, so there’s no point in hiding it or denying it.
I mean, what I’m getting at is, if you were to “erase your past” as you said, then you’d be erasing all of the things that you’ve learned from it. The present and future matter the most, absolutely, but they’re inexplicably inextricably bound to what has come before. Dissatisfaction with the past -> change in the present -> better future. You’re not clinging desperately to the past, you’re bringing it along with you into the future. I think it’s better to go hand in hand, rather than kicking and screaming.
I certainly don’t want to get involved where I’m not wanted, but I used to have plenty of friends who didn’t know me, either. It’s kind of why I started writing about myself here, because I was tired of hiding everything. The people who never really cared will drift away if you let them, but if someone is particularly tenacious, I’d say it’s best just to be honest about it. If they know that you totally do not want them in your life, and continue to insist, that’s harder to deal with. But you’ll never make any progress if you just wait for them to figure it out on their own.
…Because they probably never will.
Geez, how hard is it to just get rid of people?
I don’t think I’ll ever be able to become what I want without erasing my past and getting people to let go, I just want to be myself.
Your past will always be a part of you, no matter how much you try to deny it. You can kick people out of your present life, and you can become a different person from who you used to be. But who you were is just as important as who you’re going to be.
Last summer, when we moved to Ottawa, my mom decided that we should all have our own cell phones. My dad already had his own, so she got a 3-year contract family plan for herself, my brother, and I. Her phone, the main line, cost $35/month + $20/month for countrywide My5 call/text. The other two lines were each $30/month. Total: $115/month. We got the most basic crap phones you could get, because hey, we never needed fancy cell phones before. I started itching for an upgrade after a few months, but the reality was that all I needed to do was making one call per month and send text messages, so anything would do.
BUT THEN DISASTER STRUCK. About a month ago, after being crushed and scratched by 30 kg (66 lb) bags of concrete mix, my phone’s signal quality went down drastically. To the point where I would have no signal anywhere in my house, for days at a time. My mom and brother had identical phones, and when placed beside each other, I would have no signal and they would have a perfect one. This was the excuse I was waiting for! The phone either needed to be repaired/replaced, or I’d get an upgrade. However, I can’t afford a data plan, so I needed to see if I could upgrade the phone without paying for wireless data. When Lifehacker posted about Geekaphone, a site that would suggest the perfect phone for your needs, I made a list and set off for the phone store.
I asked after a handful of phones, and the only way I avoid a data plan would be to buy the phone off-contract for $400+, with the phones at the top of my list being $600. If I got a data plan, I’d get the “with a 2-year contract” price. However, I needed to pay a $35 administration fee for changing phones (offset by a $50 mail-in rebate), and a $120 “early upgrade fee” for not waiting out the contract. But again, this requires me to sign up for a $30/month data plan. I certainly can’t afford a $600 phone, and I definitely can’t afford to spend $700 on a data plan over the next two years. Well, I probably could in the long term, but with no income during the school year, it might be tough. And so, I resigned myself to finding out my options for an out-of-warranty replacement.
Returning home, we dialed up our wireless provider and made our way to a customer service agent. It would cost $20 to replace my phone with an identical model, but for $40 I could get a Samsung A886 (meh), and for $80 I could get a Sony Ericson Xperia X1 (meh-ish). No matter what I got, I’d keep the same contract and not need to shell out for a data plan. To give me time to research the phones, my mom (who is nice and polite pretty much all the time) asked if we could change our plan to match the current offerings. Eventually, we came out of the deal paying $65/month for the main line and $15/month for the two additional lines, with 500 extra monthly daytime minutes and countrywide My5 for all three phones. Total: $95/month, for a better plan. Not bad, and we didn’t even have to yell and scream and talk to customer retention!
I had grudgingly decided to go with the X1, if only for its sliding keyboard. However, since we’d earned a lot of goodwill from the customer service lady, I asked what kind of phone I could get for more than $80. The next step up was the Motorola Quench (known as the Cliq XT in the US) for $130. Officially, it’s stuck at Android 1.5 because there was no way to get 2.1 to perform adequately on the mediocre hardware. But recent updates to CyanogenMod have added support for the phone, so the decision was made: get the Quench, root it the day I get it, and optimize everything for performance. Since I spend most of my time either at home or on campus, I’ll have access to secure-ish WiFi most of the time. Why bother spending $30/month just so I can check Facebook while I’m on the bus?
The only potential downside here is that the phone might just suck so much that nothing runs well on it, but with all the customization options, I’m hoping I can manage. As long as I keep in mind that it doesn’t have gigabytes of RAM, I should be able to run things pretty smoothly… one at a time, anyway.
Until I get a hold of it around Friday, you’re safe from me talking about all the stuff I’m doing with it. But when I get it, expect to be inundated with an absolute nerdfest of Android-love.
Greenman gaming is a website where you can buy games for Steam and for their own capsule client for cheaper than the regular retail price, you also get an extra $5/£5 store credit if you register and buy through my link, there’s also a 20% off discount code for you here: 20PEC-FACEB-SAVER
If you’re thinking of buying Deus Ex HR, Red Orchestra, etc then I strongly recommend buying from there.
I wasn’t sure if I wanted to get Deus Ex: Human Revolution for $45, but it cost me $34 here with the 20% off coupon and… yeah I bought it. You don’t get the credit until after your first purchase, though. However, they have a neat thing where they suggest games you could buy with the credit you’ve earned - I could get Hitman: Blood Money or Tropico 4! I’ll just hang on to it for now, and come back next time I want to buy a PC game.
I’d pass on my referral link, but that would be uncouth. I am grateful to our bro, Cameron, and I shall show my gratitude for this deal by passing on his referral link as well. Also, Vael bought the game yesterday and paid more than I did so har har.
Stumbled upon the website psychologyofgames.com, which I will hyperlink even though you could drag it into your address bar, and in addition to being worth exploring on your own I thought I’d link to a few interesting pieces. And actually, I’ve posted about them before - their Three Reasons We Buy Those Crazy Steam Bundles article is very good at keeping me from wasting my money!
A follow up to something I posted long, long ago is Procedural Generation and User-Generated Content II: Storylines, AI, and Emergent Gameplay. I didn’t title it, so don’t blame me. While I like the idea of generating random contexts, and I’m sure it is being done already in the games we play. The emergent storylines part, in particular, is very interesting to me from an AI perspective - but also in terms of what the player can be allowed to do in something like a browser-based game where players have to be explicitly allowed to do things. Also, basing the game on text (i.e. most of the browser-based games I’ve played, because games made in Flash are “flash games”) makes it super easy to add mechanics. You want to let the player seduce, or murder, or steal from, or lie to any NPC in the game? Easy, just give them dialogue options. No need to animate it all, or have art, or a button dedicated to doing this action, or show what happens when they succeed or fail.
All of that being said, I’m dubious about the idea of totally procedural games. It would have to be very, very sophisticated to match the kind of output talented human writers and game designers can come up with. As soon as a player realizes that they’re being sent to [kill] [X] [for Y coins] for the seventeenth time, by some randomly selected character archetype (last time it was a peasant, this time a wizard!) it will all fall apart. Not only that, it would be hard to craft deep and truly meaningful experiences - mature experiences! - without a human hand to guide the complexity.
Catherine is deep and meaningful by virtue of its subject matter, but then there are games like The Witcher (first and second) that become deep and meaningful through the complexity of the situations they present. Any given quest has various interpretations, based on who you talk to and what you know. So then any procedural generation has to make your gameplay situation, but also add a lot of context in terms of ulterior motives and hidden information unavailable to the player. And then you get into the realm of things that need so much processing power, they have to be generated during development rather than at game time, and that’s cheaper than paying humans but far less dynamic.
Game AI vs Traditional AI offers interesting insight into AI in games, and why it sometimes seems to lack in the Intelligence department. I don’t have much to add to what’s already there, but if I tell you that it’s an article about how to make players feel like they are The Batman will you be more interested?
Yeah, I thought you would be.
Trenches seems like a relatively interesting webcomic project between Penny Arcade and the guy behind PvP, at least as far as a webcomic with five comics can be “interesting.” However, what is very interesting is their Tales From The Trenches that accompany each comic - anonymous stories from people who have worked as game testers. These are fantastic tales of horror, and I highly recommend reading a few. The one you’ll see linked to if you read this the day I post it, titled “Ship It,” is particularly soul-crushing.
vael:
https://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/6.0/releasenotes/
Honestly seems more like a release for developers. The problem with firefox releasing like this is that they’re trying to compete with Chrome… but chrome users aren’t even aware when their software is updated most of the time….
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/is-it-compatible/
This puts an addon’s compatibility versions right in your addons thing, and all of my addons have assumed compatibility for FF 7-12. Probably because all the developer has to do is type “compatibility = 7” in a file and it claims to work. I actually still haven’t updated from FF 4, but now that I see everything is compatible even with FF 6, I may as well update.
Still, I’d be interested in knowing what Chrome does differently with its addons from Firefox. Or does it just have different kinds of addons? If an addon doesn’t change anything that a browser update would (interface, deeper fiddly features) then it makes sense it would always be compatible, but those are the best kind of FF addons. Also, I have my addons set to update themselves automatically in FF 4, so I never know when I’ve gotten a new version of one. You can set the same option for Firefox updates, but I like to have control over that.
[Continuing from yesterday’s post about Catherine, here’s the critique part. Or at least, critique-ish. It was meant to be one post originally, but it got to be really long. As in, I spent three hours writing it, so… Best to split it up. You know, this seems to happen whenever I talk about the game…]
Up until the end, I was also going to say that Catherine is a great example of how you can make meaningful gameplay. There’s a lot of symbolism in the game, and most of the gameplay is a metaphor for one thing or another. Then they shot themselves in the foot during the ending. “Did you notice the central conflict that this game’s masterful creators placed at its core?” says the narrator. And then they tell you what that was. So… what did I say about literal references to these deeper meanings, because otherwise players won’t notice? “The stairway Vincent was forced to climb could be taken as a metaphor,” the narrator says after explaining the central conflict. And then they tell you what it was. And we were so close to a game that just hints at this stuff! You get a few hints in the game towards the end, and at the start there’s a nod towards the metaphor as well to get you thinking. So you’ll probably get a rough idea of what’s going on if you think about what’s going on as you play, and that’s great - some serious analysis would piece the full story together, even if they never explained it. And then they did! It’s not necessarily a bad thing, but I kind of wish they hadn’t. Still, at least everyone will get the idea, and maybe take the time to re-evaluate the game based on the explanation.
I’ve got a few things to mention inspired by comments on a (spoiler-filled, you’ve been warned) community blog on Destructoid called, simply enough, “Catherine Sucks”. One of the main problems the author has is that most of the game feels like the “rising action” of your typical three act structure, and Vincent really only makes up his mind in the game’s final hours, which makes the conclusion feel weak and a bit rushed. Commentor (commentator?) ‘fulldamage’ notes that the sort of long-form character development the author is looking for is the “hero’s journey” type, exactly what you got in Personas 3 and 4 - by contrast, Catherine is more like a short story, and it focuses on just one pivotal moment in time rather than an entire lifetime of the characters. The comment by 'Noir’ echoes something stated in the Art Book included in the game - the character designer, Shigenori Soejima, writes that the characters in Catherine are all fully-grown adults who don’t necessarily grow throughout the story as the teenagers in Persona games would. When you meet someone for the first time, you’re not going to get every detail about their lives or see some long struggle to overcome their problems - you just pick up bits and pieces of what’s important to them as you talk to them, and that’s more or less what happens in Catherine. 'The Silent Protagonist’ also mentions that it’s a more “adult” - dare I say “mature”? - kind of story because none of the characters are blank slates or in need of psychological profiling, but how things are said and what’s left unsaid can speak volumes.
I didn’t mention the game’s story in my “review” up there because that would imply that you’re taking something as is, and just playing through the game to unlock the story that the developers made for you. Browsing through the GameFAQs board for Odin Sphere on the PS2, a few people said that even though the gameplay can get tedious (since you play 6 different characters, and start over each time and do the same basic stuff) it’s worth playing for “the story.” At that point, why not just look up the cutscenes on youtube or download a completed save file so you can watch the cutscenes in theater mode? That’s what we call film, where you passively watch something that’s delivered to you, as a finished product. From that point of view, the first comment by 'VenusInFurs’ on the c-blog I linked to is absolutely right - the plot and characters are “sub-par” and it’s a “typical anime,” and the last three hours truly do get “beyond silly.” “There’s nothing deep here, it’s not intellectually stimulating or mature,” says 'VenusInFurs.’ But that’s if the situations in the game mean nothing to you, and you’re just watching what the characters choose to do without thinking about it. If you empathize with the situations, and make decisions based on your honest feelings, there’s a thousand different stories to be told by this game. And like the other commentors mentioned, there’s a lot of character development for you to infer from the dialogue, in the sense of things to learn about the characters (i.e. how they develop for the player) as opposed to ways that the characters themselves change over time.
Speaking of the plot twists towards the end of the game, they occur so quickly that it might make your head spin. I truly don’t want to spoil the game for anyone, and I don’t accept the “willing to be spoiled” idea because it will ruin the game for you should I ever bring my PS3 to your house and make you play it. Which is something I would rather do than post story spoilers! Suffice to say that the game could have ended at one point, and it would have been pretty interesting and tragic. Fifteen minutes later, a (literally) crazy ending opportunity comes up, and it would have been phenomenal. But the game continues after that, and ruins the whole thing with a really dumb explanation. The problem is that they take a game that has been totally “normal” - the Nightmares stages are weird, but they’re nightmares, right? - and throw that all out the window. Either of the two points that I mentioned - the tragic one, and the crazy one, which you’ll understand if you’ve played the game - would have been so much more fitting, and even interesting. So, yeah, from that point of view the game has a pretty bad “story.” But again, that’s only if you take it all at face value and care nothing for the situations the game puts you in.
If it weren’t for the part where they explain it all to you, there’d be a lot of analysis to make about Catherine. And there’s stuff I could analyze about it anyway, but that would require spoilers, and I wanted to avoid those in this particular post. Mainly, the purpose of this post was to say how much I love the game and convince people to buy it. Then a little bit of critique, just the amount I can do without really mentioning anything specific. Kudos to you if you made it to the end of this post, and I hope you give the game a shot if you haven’t already. If you already have, have an internet high-five.
First, some good news: Catherine sold really, really well. It’s the highest selling game at launch that Atlus USA has ever published, so advertising, word of mouth, and good reviews all clearly paid off. To whoever failed to advertise Shadows of the Damned and Child of Eden: you’re doing it wrong, but it sucks that your games sold so badly.
Anyway, here’s the “review” part of this post. The English voice actors are absolutely fantastic. I mean, these are award-winning performances. When they give the award for best voice acting to some other game at the Spike TV Awards and whatever other award shows games have, it’ll be an absolute sin. As for the music, Shoji Meguro’s score is fantastic as always - the game features a lot of remixes of classical music, but mostly avoids the really iconic stuff so you don’t find it overly familiar. So, the audio: terrific.
In terms of the visuals, the game has a great aesthetic. The character models in particular deserve special recognition, because they look “better” than anything I saw in Heavy Rain, or that I’ve seen from LA Noire. It’s probably got something to do with the light anime vibe and the fact that they weren’t going for photo-realism, but Catherine dodges the uncanny valley completely. I mean, the thing about the former two games is that they tried to portray completely realistic people, and it was weird to see because it was done imperfectly - you can’t necessarily render every little wrinkle on someone’s face, much less animate and shade it perfectly. But I actually think I like the in-game parts of Catherine more than the anime parts, because it looks that good. In sum, the visuals are just as good as the audio.
The gameplay has two different parts: the puzzles, and everything else. I’ll start with the puzzles, set in the main character’s nightmares. I found them tough, even on Easy difficulty, and I wouldn’t recommend even playing on Normal your first time through the game. In Easy mode, you have the option to undo 9 (?) of your most recent moves, so you don’t have to restart the level if you push a block the wrong way. Which happens, even when you’ve been playing the game for hours. I don’t play a lot of puzzle games, really, and I didn’t know if I’d like the Nightmare stages at first. But the action is really quick, and when you complete a difficult boss stage it’s a whole lot more satisfying than some jRPG boss fight.
Aside from the regular stages in the story, there are 128 (!!) stages in an arcade cabinet in-game, and a whole bunch more stages in the Babel mode that you unlock by getting gold medals on Normal difficulty. I don’t really want to tell you what the puzzles are like, or how they introduce different types of blocks, because none of that matters. The puzzle stages are intense, and you’d be hard-pressed not to enjoy them once you give it a shot. I had to look up walkthrough videos to get past a few mind-bending stages, because sometimes you just wont get what they want you to do. Even so, I finished the game and found myself wanting more puzzles, which - as much as I like the game - is more than I can say about the battle system in Persona 4.
The “everything else” gameplay is all of the social simulation stuff, but some of that occurs at the “landings” in between Nightmare stages. The game’s story mode is referred to as “Golden Playhouse,” and a narrator introduces you to the game by saying that your role as a “viewer” is to help guide the main character, Vincent, and that his fate depends on you. You aren’t supposed to be Vincent, or agree with the way he deals with situations, but instead make honest choices when talking to people and answering questions. Your choices influence Vincent’s inner thoughts, and at different points in the game a meter will come up and you’ll see the results of your “guiding.” For example, what you do before Vincent first cheats on his girlfriend decides how he reacts to waking up with a strange woman in his bed - you don’t get to literally choose whether he thinks “oh shit, what have I done” or “SCORE!”. So when you’re playing, be honest and just go with what you’d do IF you got into a similar situation - even if you wouldn’t do the kinds of things Vincent does.
Anyway, I found a lot of meaning in this part of the gameplay, and it’s pretty good mechanically as well. You’re in the bar, and you spend your time talking to people, drinking, and answering text messages (which is great, by the way, and much more interesting than the e-mail mechanic in .hack or Xenosaga), and as time passes people will enter and leave the bar. Who you talk to, and what you say, influences their lives… although if you don’t talk to them, or care about their problems, then what happens to them probably doesn’t matter to you. There’s a theme of selfishness and selflessness to this part of the game, especially in the Nightmare stages, where most of the people you meet think that helping others will only give them more competition for survival. You can play the game as a selfish person who only cares about himself, or a kind, compassionate person who realizes that it doesn’t cost anything to give people a few kind words and helps others to help themselves. Although, because of the way the game plays, you don’t really get to know the characters well - it’s just a brief snapshot of their lives. More on that in a bit.
So with all of that said, it gets high scores in every category and I really do think it’s worth $60. It’ll probably take you 12-15 hours to finish the story for the first time, which is a pretty good length because it doesn’t overstay its welcome but gives you enough to feel like you got what you paid for. After you’ve finished the game, if you replay on the same difficulty level, you can actually skip the puzzle stages and just play for the story if you want to try for different endings - you could probably blaze through in a few hours that way. If you hate the game after playing the demo, you probably won’t like the full game, but do give it a shot if you own a PS3 or 360. If you have both, I’d recommend the PS3 version, because I’ve heard the 360 version may not play as smoothly, and I hear the d-pad on the 360 controller sucks? But then, as someone who only owns a PS3, of course I would say that. Still, consider giving it a rental, and at least download the demo if you have a decent internet connection.
[This will continue tomorrow, it was really long so I split it up]
Tying up some loose ends here with a lot of small things that don’t quite deserve entire posts of their own. This is all the miscellaneous stuff I’ve been doing in recent weeks, but haven’t really gotten around to posting about. So, without further ado…
Anime:
I also watched Summer Wars last week while waiting for EBGames to open and give me my copy of Catherine. It was kind of the anime equivalent of a Hollywood summer blockbuster - in other words, take the forgettable cash-grab junk and replace it with beautiful art and a fun little scrappy-kid-saves-the-world story that doesn’t overstay its welcome. Also, they do some neat future-esque computer stuff that is actually possible, which makes it more awesome somehow. I was really happy when the gamer kid lends his laptop to a guy and switches to a different virtual desktop on his desktop-cube.
——————————————————
I watched American Beauty a few weeks ago, and I’d definitely recommend watching it. I’m not sure what to say about it, really, because it doesn’t have any one core thesis, but it’s got a ton of little ideas worth thinking about and it’s open to a lot of interpretation. I don’t know a whole lot about any of the parts of film, but I can tell there’s a lot of artistry in it. If you’re going to watch a movie, you may as well watch this one instead of some dumb romantic comedy or popcorn-munching action movie.
——————————————————
I’ve started and nearly finished Breath of Fire: Dragon Quarter for the PS2, and I think it’s fantastic. I really think it’s one of the better jRPGs I’ve played in recent memory, though my backlog for those has tons of quality stuff waiting to be played. It takes a lot from roguelikes - you can restart the game and keep the equipment, money, and some of the experience you’ve gained, and the more restarts you’ve done, the more you unlock of the story. It’s a very quick, focused version of a jRPG - I’ll probably be pushing 30-40 hours by the time I finish my first time, but the game rates a “perfect” playthrough as 8 hours or less. It’s just really solid mechanics, all the time. There are a few little town areas, with basic utility NPCs, and one relatively short sidequest. Well, plus the Antz Colony passive sidequest.
Now, allegedly FF XIII was an attempt to streamline the jRPG and cut out all the fat, but it felt very lacking. It felt empty, dull, pretty and flashy but with no substance. Dragon Quarter, on the other hand, is streamlined and constantly satisfying. To me, FF XIII felt like it gave me no reason to enjoy what I was doing - it never seemed like I was making any progress, or accomplishing anything useful. Dragon Quarter doesn’t have that problem, and for one reason or another it’s just an inherently more satisfying experience. It’s probably just a great combination of all the things it does well, against the things FF XIII did not. Anyway, I super enjoyed it.
Also, I’m going to talk more about Catherine soon, but it’s going to get its own post. So wait for that.
——————————————————
I read Neil Gaiman’s American Gods during my vacation to PEI, Robert Sawyer’s Wonder, and Patrick Rothfuss’s Name of the Wind. All were excellent, and I recommend them wholeheartedly. I’m working on finishing Steven Erikson’s The Crippled God, and I started George R. R. Martin’s A Dance With Dragons and Frank Herbert’s Dune. I know I should finish one book before starting two new ones (at the same time!) but when I’ve got two houses and a car (where I’ve spent a lot of time lately) I need to have something to read all the time. Erikson is doing his thing, and I happen to love it. The HBO adaptation of Game of Thrones - which I haven’t mentioned yet, so know this: I love it, go watch it! - has changed my view of Martin’s work, and it’s better for it. Peter Dinklage’s voice behind Tyrion’s lines is just great. As for Dune, I’m enjoying it so far, but I’ll get back to you when I finish it.
——————————————————
I’m probably forgetting plenty of stuff, but I can’t really call to mind everything I’ve done recently. Maybe I’ve already posted about the books I read, too? I didn’t think I said much about my vacation because it would be boring to tell you about how I hung out with my friends. I’ve been catching up on things in my bookmarks and Read It Later lists, which is nice, but many of them weren’t quite worth posting about. I haven’t been working on my Grand Quest To Finish All The Final Fantasies, but whatever. Although, I did read The Final Fantasy VII Letters and alongside the Final Fantasy Things tumblr, it’s got me feeling better about the vast amounts of time I’ve spent on this. There’s a certain sense of beautiful community behind these jokes, and I kind of don’t regret spending 50-100 hours on each of these games. Maybe it isn’t time perfectly spent, but spent well enough. I can live with that.
Part 2 of my post from yesterday. If you haven’t read it, this won’t make as much sense. I said that I would write about “how I see love, why I say that Brittany “cheated” on me with an emphasis on the quotation marks, and why I have no problem with it.” Read on if you’re interested, and if not, you probably hate me by now. Sorry!
……
NOTE: THIS IS UNEDITED AND MAY BE OFFENSIVE AND/OR POORLY WRITTEN
—
Okay, I’ll admit that I still check your tumblrs and although I’m trying to keep a low profile… I really have to reply to this.
I guess this is partly because I don’t like your point of view but mostly because it’s just an interesting subject.—
Hmmm, where should I start?
Well here’s something, it’s pathetic to be selfless.
I mean this and if you don’t already know why, you should by the time I’ve finished explaining myself.You’re losing if you’re being selfless, you’re worse off, you care more than they do, etc.
I’ve never really had a good relationship that involved me being selfless, and by the looks of it, neither have you.A relationship is more like a mutual agreement; you have something to offer them, they have something to offer you. This isn’t love, this is just my definition of a relationship.
Now, if you’re being selfless in a relationship, guess what? You’re losing, you’re with them because you love them, not because of what you can get from them.
You need that person to feel the same way about you for you to be on even ground.A good relationship is a balanced one.
All in moderation.Here’s where it gets complicated.
Love is a fickle and difficult thing, it’s difficult to control and it usually has awful timing. To put it simply, love is a mess.
You don’t want to take love lightly because it’ll bite on you on the arse as soon as you throw it off balance.This is why you can’t be selfless, the most emotionally invested will be the most hurt by the end of it. Selflessness is the path to self destruction.
(I’ll write more on this if you ask me to.)
—
This is the part that sickens me. The fact that you could accept being cheated on, the fact that you’d let this shit happen to you.
I really wonder if you have any pride at all, you never seem to show any backbone and that’s one of the reasons why I never particularly made an effort to talk to you.Y’know what? I don’t think I can talk about this subject without getting biased or angry. I guess I’ll write more (if you want to see it) when I can be sensible about it.
The difference here is that you’re looking at relationships as something game theory calls “zero sum” - in order for one person to gain, another person has to lose. Wikipedia’s example is cutting a cake - if one person gets a larger piece, then someone else gets a smaller piece. On the other hand, I see it as a “nonzero sum” situation - essentially a win/win situation. If I say something nice to cheer up a friend, I haven’t lost anything by giving them a bit of happiness. Which sounds dumb because you can’t give happiness but shut up. Anyway, now that I’ve introduced the idea of nonzero sum situations…
What, exactly, do you lose by helping someone? You say that as if it’s a totally obvious conclusion. And caring about someone more than they care about you is only a problem if there’s a massive difference (i.e. they hardly care about you, while you’re under the impression that they are the love of your life) or you think that caring about someone entitles you to get something out of it. The thing is, whether you’re friends or more than that, having a good relationship with someone probably makes your life better. You enjoy talking to them online, or hanging out, or whatever. So you’re getting something out of the deal by default.
Not to mention you aren’t entitled to anything. You don’t “deserve” to have someone love you, or stay in a relationship with you. You earn that. They could leave at any moment, so don’t take them for granted. They probably won’t, but so what? You shouldn’t treat someone badly under the assumption that you can make up for it later.
There’s a fundamental problem here in that you say all of these things as if a relationship has to be zero sum. It doesn’t. I’ve become friends with Vael over the past two years, and not only has it not cost me anything to have great conversations with him, we’re both better off for it. Why would a romantic relationship be any different?
—————————————————————-
It needs to be said that love isn’t binary - you’re not 0: in love and then suddenly 1: in love. When you kind of like someone, you definitely shouldn’t place their happiness above your own yet. When you’re starting to love them a little, you should think twice before doing something that would hurt them. Then when you love them a lot, you’re really, truly in love, that’s when you should be selfless. If you’ve come that far, they probably feel the same way. Ideally, they’d treat you equally well.
If it’s a romantic relationship, and you break up, then whoever made that choice probably has good reason for doing so. A lot of the time, the other person probably still cares about them, and is naturally pretty hurt by that. But then, if your feelings for each other were mutual, why would you be breaking up? Of course the person who still cares will be hurt. So I don’t think it’s right to judge the end of a relationship the way you have. Alternatively, you’re judging entire relationships based on how they end, which is equally wrong.
—————————————————————-
Two things that should be disgusting to anyone with a heart: basing a relationship on what you can get from someone, and basing a relationship on the need to possess. Granted, we all have acquaintances we only talk to when we need notes for a class we skipped missed, and other small things like that. I’d understand if people have a problem with being used that way - because, yeah, if you’re that person then you’re being used. But I’m not going to get worked up over something like that. Now, if someone only talks to you when they want to borrow large amounts of money, should you be ok with that? No, definitely not. But that’s different from giving someone your notes, or only being asked to hang out in specific situations.
The second, then - the desire to possess. This is supreme selfishness, and it’s something a lot of people wind up in without realizing it. Love isn’t based on the desire to possess someone as an object, for them to be yours, and yours alone. Are you upset that your partner is leaving you because you care about them and think they’d be happier if you were together? Or are you upset because you’ve lost a thing that is yours and it makes you happy, which is what really matters? It’s one thing to be hurt, because something that made you happy is gone. It’s another thing to want it back only because it made you happy. When your happiness makes someone else unhappy, that’s a zero sum situation, and you should generally feel bad about that. If it’s someone you care about (or think you care about), you should feel especially bad about it, and doing so is proof that you care.
So I ask you, what would having pride have done to change my situation? Should I have been proud to possess such a great thing, one that makes me happy all the time? Should I have been proud to have a girlfriend, simply because I did good things for her and her gratitude was confused for love? I’m proud to have done the right thing, even though it hurt. I’m proud that we managed to work things out in the end. I’m proud that I had the strength to pull through it all. I’m proud of the things that I can do, the good fortune I’ve had to lead the life I have, and the relationships I’ve forged along the way.
I have enough of a spine to stand by what I believe, but not so much that I become a massive, bony dick who stands stubbornly by things that are proven wrong, and insults others because they disagree and not because they deserve such unkind words. It would sicken me to see someone act like that, and I could never live with myself if I were to act that way. Luckily, then, those kinds of people tend to be unaware of their true nature. I can only hope that someone would show me the truth, if I became so despicable.
Part 2 of my post from yesterday. If you haven’t read it, this won’t make as much sense. I said that I would write about “how I see love, why I say that Brittany "cheated” on me with an emphasis on the quotation marks, and why I have no problem with it.“ Read on if you’re interested, and if not, you probably hate me by now. Sorry!
I think the ideal form of love is selfless. If you really, truly love someone, then you should want them to be as happy as possible. If being in love requires you to get something out of it, then you don’t love them as much as you think you do. If I had forced Brittany to stay away from this guy, because I really did think that being with her was the only way I could be happy, that wouldn’t have been love. Or, at least, it would have been showing that I loved myself the most, and cared more about my happiness than hers. I let her go because I knew that if it worked out, she would be happier with him than she ever would be with me. We might have been content together, but because she didn’t truly love me, it wouldn’t be a perfect, happily-ever-after kind of thing.
This is mainly a romantic thing, because it’s not like you ever formally agree to spend the rest of your life with your closest friends. Still, when you care about someone a lot, you should be more interested in what you can do for them than what they can do for you. Since they (hopefully) care about you the same way, they’ll take care of you just as selflessly. And everyone wins.
So, as for infidelity specifically, I should start by saying that I wouldn’t ever do something like that to begin with. The fact that I could accept it from my partner doesn’t mean that I condone it. To me, the worst thing about a one-night stand would be if it was kept a secret - that’s a betrayal of trust, which hurts. Who cares about the sex at that point? If they come clean right away and don’t make a habit of it, it’s forgivable. And could you really blame someone if they fell in love with someone else? It sucks, but sometimes people just click. Again, if they keep it a secret and start seeing someone else, that’s intentional and wrong. But it’s love, and if they’d be happier that way, let them go and move on. I do think that we can be monogamous with the right partners, and I’m willing to forgive a lot. And, yeah, I’m tough enough to let someone go so they can be happy. It’s hard to appreciate right away, but I think it’s the best decision to make.
It never really bothered me that much that Brittany was with this other guy, that she had feelings for him, and so on. It was never a secret - she asked for my permission repeatedly, and I gave it every time, with the one condition being that she not do anything behind my back. If she’d done all of this and pretended our relationship was fine until the day that we broke up, I would have been infinitely more hurt. I would have no issues telling people that she cheated on me. If I were to say that now, it would make it seem like I was victimized - when in reality I personally encouraged her to go after this guy. Yeah, we were "officially” together while all of this was going on, but that really doesn’t matter. She didn’t want to hurt me, but at the same time, she was falling in love with this guy and going back to me would have been impossible. I can’t honestly say “no, you should stop yourself from falling in love, and also you should stay in a relationship where you are content rather than search for one where you are truly happy.” Even if someone could do that, why would they? And why would you want them to?
Anyway, now you probably understand better why neither of us is honestly worried about old feelings coming back. The people who were worried about that, they don’t know this stuff - they just know that we dated in the past and now I’m offering her a place to stay. I’m still surprised that I’ve never posted about this before, but now I have and now you know! It’s probably not worth the effort to explain all of this to people so that they can understand why we could live together and not consider being more than friends. But the people who know we were together ought to know why we broke up, and not just that we did.
I mean, man. How did I not write about this before? Still amazed by that.
I’ve been thinking for the past week about what different people get from reading my tumblr. Random internet strangers probably just read the posts about things they’re interested in. People who know me well will get to know me better. But for people who don’t know me yet, it’s not a perfect window into my life - there are a lot of things that don’t come across all that well in text. I post about the things that interest me, and I post a lot of information about my life, but not so much about more abstract things - what I believe in, what kind of person I am, and so on. There’s not much point in simply telling you those things. because there would be nothing to back it up, and even if you accept that I’m nice because I said so, it wouldn’t really leave much of an impression on you. Trying to show you things like that with words is tough, but I’ll think about it and work on a few drafts to give the internet at large a better idea of who I am.
I started playing Catherine last night, and aside from being a pretty satisfying puzzle game (as long as you don’t get really stuck on a hard part), it’s an absolutely wonderful thing to experience. I’d be surprised if I got more than ten hours out of it, but the value of playing it can’t be measured in time spent playing. The basic gist is that you guide Vincent, a 32 year old underachiever, through the worst week of his life. First, his girlfriend of five years, Katherine, starts talking about marriage. Then he drinks a bit too much and has a one-night stand with a girl named Catherine. What happens from there depends on the player’s decisions, but it’s a really well-crafted experience.
If you absolutely love puzzle games, there’s probably $60 worth of gameplay in there, but everyone else should play the game on easy and act as honestly as possible. It’ll get you thinking about what you would do in a given situation, and about relationships in general. Which is absolutely fantastic, and I’m so glad that this is a “mainstream” video game. I mean, ok, it’s not a AAA blockbuster release, but it’s not some budgetless, vague indie game either. It’s a game that deals with marriage, cheating, responsibility, the nature of relationships… It’s a work of art in every definition of the word.
So I’ve been thinking a lot since I started playing it, and naturally one of the things I’ve been thinking about is infidelity. Apparently, I’ve actually never written about this before, which is surprising because of what happened between Brittany and I. It’s kind of an important detail, which makes it strange that I’ve never mentioned it. It also means I have to write about it now, in order to get into the stuff I want to say. Alright, so, here’s the quick and dirty version. When we were in 9th grade, Brittany got involved with a guy a year younger than her, and she was really serious about him. It ended badly, she did her best to get over it, and then in November of 10th grade we started dating again. In PEI, high school doesn’t start until 10th grade, so when we moved onto high school she didn’t really see the guy until the fall of 11th grade. Before too long, despite having a girlfriend, he started flirting with her. She was wary of him because he proved to be a supreme asshole the first time, but I knew she was drawn to him in a way she’d never been drawn to me, and so I gave her permission to talk to him and braced for impact. Fast forward a few months, and by November things are very serious between them and we finally break up ten days before our anniversary.
I don’t think I need to get into what happened between them after that, but suffice to say that he was actually worse than a supreme asshole. An uber asshole, if you will, the horrible embodiment of all the terrible things women expect from men. Meanwhile, I had encouraged my girlfriend - who I loved dearly, and who was at the time my one source of happiness - to leave me. In the end, her relationship with him made her reevaluate her feelings for me, and there ended the possibility of us getting back together. Understandably, our relationship became strained as things went on, and we spoke less and less often. Eventually it seemed like we couldn’t even manage to carry on a conversation. Considering she was my only close friend, the only person I thought I could share my secrets, doubts, and fears with, this was hard for me. I was incredibly lonely, and of course I spoke occasionally with my friends and family about this stuff, but it was this loneliness that led me to meet Vael and open up to him.
What I realized, over time, was that I missed Brittany as my best friend far more than I missed her as my girlfriend. We went from speaking all day, every day to never speaking at all, and that alone was hard. Not having anyone to talk to about personal stuff was worse. I don’t remember the exact details of what happened, but at some point I must have told her this and asked if we could “just be friends.” Yeah, I said that, and I said it after we’d broken up. Delicious irony, if you can ignore my crying, desperately lonely 16-year-old-self long enough to laugh about it. Of course there were issues to work through, and of course I struggled with my feelings for her. After all that time, I couldn’t just snap my fingers and only think of her as a friend. But in the end, it all worked out, and now we’re friends and she’s living in my mom’s house. It’s been almost a week now, and it hasn’t been at all awkward for me (although I’ve been at my dad’s house this whole time). She doesn’t find it weird being there, and I assume being around me is no different than it was a month ago. Which is to say I haven’t asked about that, but maybe I should.
SO OK NOW WE’RE BACK TO CATHERINE AND THE THINGS IT MADE ME THINK ABOUT. Now I can tell you how I see love, why I say that Brittany “cheated” on me with an emphasis on the quotation marks, and why I have no problem with it. Except that when I say now, I actually mean tomorrow, because this is really long. And the chances of people reading it all probably increase when it’s split up. So, that post will go up tomorrow morning, and I hope you all enjoy it!
Just a couple of links to share today as I try to clean out my bookmarks a bit. They’re #AltDevBlog posts about the practical parts of actually being a game designer, and not just a programmer who kind of designs or a designer who just throws things together. They also have a number of great comments by industry folk; Mike Birkhead in particular has some great comments, so at least read his if you choose to ignore the rest of the comments.
Respecting Design tackles the issue of everyone thinking they know how to design a game. You don’t know how to design a game just because you’ve played a few games. “No one in their right mind opens up the code depot, alters files at random, and then, when rightfully questioned on their sanity, say in defense, "Hey, everyone’s code is valid man”. So why is it ok for game design?“ Reading this made me realize that, yeah, I don’t know shit about being a game designer. I can read all the blog posts I want, but that doesn’t mean I know anything useful. Not that I thought I was a game designer, mind you, just that I thought I was learning about it. It would probably be more accurate to say that I was learning around it, if that makes any sense. Circling the perimeter without ever entering it.
Design Docs Debate is less of a debate and more a collection of interesting links in the comment thread and a few good comments - specifically, Slone’s and Mike Birkhead’s. It sounds to me like the original poster is in a program where they got really anal about the requirements - but then I remember hating essay outlines in tenth grade, too. From the sounds of things, it seems like a good design document is pretty similar to a good outline (for an essay, or a short story, or even a novel) - you can go without to a certain degree, if you’re ok ending up with a lesser result because of it. Being able to create a good one is one of the things you just end up doing when you want to produce better results, because if you sit down without a plan, your final product will be nothing like what you envisioned.
Random thought - ever notice how the "blog post” has supplanted the essay? Two hundred years ago you could be an “essayist,” someone who writes essays. Now you’re just a blogger, and your wonderful essays are just “posts” like any other. I’m going to use the term essay, so there. Lead by example, right?
A while back I posted about game review scores, and in the mean time, Extra Credits has done an episode about game reviews and one of Metacritic’s co-founders had stuff to say. Then I wrote a lengthy post that was mainly about how I rented inFamous 2 and was disappointed enough in its sameness to stop playing after only a few hours and never want to touch it again. I knew it was terrible and chose not to post it, and then the article about Metacritic was posted, so now I’m starting over and actually being relevant.
While it makes sense that most of the games we play are pretty damn awesome and could rightfully be given an 8 or 9 out of 10, I almost think it’s unfair to compare them to games nobody in their right mind will review. Compared to Carnival Extravangaza Mini-Game-Collection-for-the-Wii DX, inFamous 2 is probably the greatest game ever created. So, fine, there are games that are absolutely terrible and deserve low scores and others that are “average”, somewhere in between shit and gold, that deserve middle scores. But why shouldn’t games be reviewed in relation to each other? Why shouldn’t you give an 8/10 game like inFamous 2 a score of 6/10 as an action-adventure title (or whatever you want to call it)? Why does Assassin’s Creed Brotherhood - which I’ll admit I enjoyed the tiniest bit more than AC II, and it does have the benefit of its actually worthwhile multiplayer mode - get a high score despite being almost the same as last year’s game?
I know that people’s jobs depend on review scores, and I know that tons of people (hopefully) worked really hard on these games. But a reviewer has every right to say that it’s nothing you haven’t seen before, and you may as well go pick up last year’s Game X for half the price because it was marginally better. That’s something I’ve seen before in film and novel reviews, though it’s not like I read a huge amount of them. It makes more sense for more knowledgeable readers, who will know exactly what you mean if you say “it’s like X, if they took out the interesting characters” because they’ve played/watched/read X already. Meanwhile, less knowledgeable readers get a good recommendation and a better idea of what they’re getting into.
I know it’s uncouth to compare games to… well, anything else, because we’re all tired of being in the shadow of other mediums. But criticism for other mediums is very well established, and most game reviewers don’t deserve the title of “game critic.” They can be useful in their own ways, but I feel that reviews (with an occasional splash of critique) are naturally inferior to critiques (with an occasional splash of review). How many war films have been released recently that have nothing new or interesting to offer? Not many, because there’s more to film making than making an easy profit.
And how many military shooters have been released that have nothing new or interesting to offer? Too many, because there’s little more influential in mainstream game development than the need to make a profit.
I have received an offer, in my e-mail inbox, that is simply so good that it must be true. After all, not only did they send me an e-mail, they also offered a Skype account to contact should I wish to further discuss this wonderful advertising opportunity! I will share the message with you, because I believe that it is just so fantastic that such effective advertising opportunities are available thanks to modern technology.
———————————————————
Hi!
We want to offer you a new way of advertisement!
If you want to promote your business to the next rate or to increase useful traffic to your web-site,
If you want to make new friends or find your love,
If you want to realize something, such as a car or a house, or buy something,
Then this offer is just for you!
We own a huge number of databases, we can make any sample of recipients.
For example, country and city of residence, hobbies, profession, post, income, height, eye color and even sexual preferences!
We process all orders as soon as possible!
We are people who have no limits
Prices:
All advertising project that you want to will be beginning with $ 500 we appreciate our time.
Also there is a system of bonuses and the best offers for all your needs!
Please write us at [withheld] or Skype [withheld]
———————————————————
There is a system of bonuses, and the best offers for all your needs. They are people who have no limits - do you wish to realize a house, or find your love? They can do all that and more, with this wonderful form of effective advertising and their huge amount of databases.
The world is such a wonderful place!
vael:
“I’m really bad at reading fantasy”, and we’re all bad at “reading” games
I don’t think that the mark of a good author is to mask their symbolism to the point where people like you and the author of that article cannot see the meaning. I definitely think it’s a common…
The only way to make it obvious would be to have a character come out and explain it - the point of symbolism is that you’re using a symbol to convey something other than its literal meaning. I think that, in writing at least, symbolism is easier to pick up on than in something visual like a graphic novel or a film - look at the people analyzing Watchmen for the tiny things hidden in the corner of some panel or whatever. Which, from my understanding, was intentional on the part of the creators, but even so. At least with a novel, stopping to think about whether it might be symbolic is usually all you need to do. Direwolf is the sigil of the Starks, stag is the sigil of the Baratheons, and they find a direwolf killed by a stag - all the pieces are there, you just need to think about it.
It’s harder when you’re dealing with recurring themes or symbols that readers/academics notice, despite the author never intending them to mean anything. The accepted wisdom in critical analysis is that it’s perfectly valid to find meaning in something the author never intended, but that also means you have to do a lot of work to make sense out of it. Hence why they look for them to show how smart they are. In that case, the reason it’s so “well hidden” is that it wasn’t meant to be found.
Getting back to your point about what makes an author good, I think there are a lot of different things they could be good at. Some authors are really great at writing (I hope the distinction makes sense, it’s the easiest way to say this), and they know just the right words to use and know when to follow the rules and when to break them. Others, like George R. R. Martin, are incredibly meticulous in their planning and know from the beginning how they’re going to set up everything that follows. Steven Erikson and Martin both do a fantastic job of playing with point of view, making good use of dramatic irony and… reverse dramatic irony? Leaving the reader guessing at what a character knows and their motivations, giving them bits and pieces of information as other characters discover the truth.
In short, I’d say you could be a great author and a terrible writer, which makes me feel less guilty about some of the books I’ve read. Any story that takes several thousand pages to relate is bound to have issues, but they’ve got their strengths too. I realize this is completely tangential to what you posted, but I’d never thought of it this way until typing it just now - I felt like I shouldn’t defend an author because of their bad writing, despite enjoying their books overall. Well, good. Now we’ve all learned something!
Classes for the fall
PSYC 2001 - Intro to Research Methods in Psychology
PHIL 2501 - Intro to Philosophy of the Mind
LING 3002 - Phonology I
COMP 2001 - Intro to Systems Programming
CGSC 2001 - Intro to Cognitive Science
Classes for the winter
PSYC 2700 - Cognitive Psychology
PSYC 2200 - Biological Foundations of Behaviour
LING 2005 - Linguistic Analysis I
COMP 2004 - Programming in C++
CGSC 2002 + tutorial - Theories & Methods in Cognitive Science
[edit: I wish tumblr would put multiple spaces between paragraphs to make my walls of text less intimidating, because I’m bound to write them anyway]
I’ve been surprised before, but officially, I actually only have the one tutorial in the winter. I expected to have a tutorial in COMP 2004, and LING 2005, while LING 3002 is a strong candidate too. Won’t be surprised if I come to class and they tell us to sign up for tutorial times, anyway.
The one problem with my schedule this year is that I couldn’t fit the french course I wanted into my schedule: FREN 2401 - Mechanics of language: French (liberally translated from fonctionnement d'une langue: le français). Basically, studying the structure, sounds, and so on of both Canadian French and French from France. France French. First of all, I thought it would be interesting, but it would probably help with my french too. In a grammar course, they mainly just tell you “this is how it is.” But a linguistic analysis could tell you why it is that way. The other thing is that I still want to do a minor in French and for that I need four credits, or eight classes. FREN 2401 is a full-year course, and both of the available times conflicted with classes I need for my degree. There are more french linguistics classes beyond this first one, so I’d take those later and fill out my required credits.
So anyway! Instead of taking some french courses I wasn’t particularly interested in, which is a recipe for disaster and apathy, I grabbed a couple more programming courses. Considering how many jobs I couldn’t apply for because I didn’t have experience with C++, I thought it would be a good idea to get some. Unfortunately, COMP 2001 is required for COMP 2004, which also means I wouldn’t be “learning” C++ until january. Applying for a job that’s asking for a year of experience with C++ and saying “well, I’m taking the course right now…” probably wouldn’t go over well, I’m going to use the wonderful resource that is the internet to introduce myself to C++. I probably won’t have any time to actually work on a project with it in the fall, between class and helping Mako, but I’ll start reading all those AltDevBlog posts about C++ and learn some pro tricks hopefully. Then COMP 2004 can (well, hopefully it will) teach me the rest. And I’ll keep up with Java a bit, because why not? If I do get a summer job as a programmer, it doesn’t matter a whole lot whether I’m using Java or C++.
Oops, this is getting pretty long. Well, the rest of the classes are pretty self-explanatory. All required for my degree, and they should all be interesting, so yay. Linguistic Analysis II is only offered in the fall, so I’ll be doing that next year and that way I won’t forget everything I did in Analysis I. The tutorial for CGSC 2002 will probably involve Python somehow, because Jim Davies is teaching it. Otherwise, I can’t imagine what we’d be doing. I don’t think we’d be doing actual research in an undergraduate class, that’s all.
And, of course, my notes will be up on UniNotes as I take them. When classes actually start, or when I go pick up text books (because it would take thirty times longer when classes have started), I’ll be able to tell you more interesting things.
A piece written by Joseph Leray on his blog. He’s a pretty cool dude. First, I wanted to say that I’m equally bad at reading fantasy, even after writing essays about symbolism and studying novels and plays in AP English. I still don’t pick up on this stuff in a first reading, which means wasting time reading again to notice that the author constantly refers to a certain symbol. It’s not difficult! I’m probably just too used to either reading for fun (and not looking for deeper meanings) or reading because I have to (and trying to finish as quickly as possible). The good news is that I won’t have to do that ever again :D
However, I wouldn’t make a post just to say that. The same can be said of playing a game - there’s a literal layer and a symbolic layer, not just to what happens (mainly, things the developers wrote) but also to what you do as a player. Analyzing the stuff that happens in cutscenes and dialog is no different from analyzing literature or film. But the things that you do, the actual interactive process of choosing to do something, is something few people know how to analyze. It’s mainly just the designers themselves who know what they were trying to say. The problem is, there’s no easy way to learn how to analyze the process of playing - either you practice by thinking very deeply about a game you know well, or you read things other people have written and learn bit by bit.
It’s something you have to design for, though, because it’s not like every game has “meaningful” gameplay. Shooting someone in Call of Duty doesn’t symbolize a whole lot beyond power fantasy. On the other hand, killing a colossus in Shadow of the Colossus has a lot of symbolic meaning. The thing is, you need a certain amount of “literacy” in the medium to get that. Otherwise, it’s just a thing that you do. If the developers don’t incorporate some sort of literal reference or hinting to the symbolism of the player’s actions most players won’t notice. So why design something most people won’t understand? I think that point of view is holding back a lot of games.
Still, we do get the occasional shining example in mainstream games, and there are plenty of fantastic indie games with deeper meanings. Although we usually find out about their deeper meanings on developer blogs and interviews. Meanwhile, we’re getting more and more sources for deeper analysis and discussion among industry folk. Now all we need is a liberal arts degree where you do nothing but play games and write essays about their deeper meanings, and we’ll be a real legitimate art form!
I haven’t been able to actually finish many tumblr posts lately, though I’ve started plenty or set articles aside to write about. I’ve been working through my Read It Later list, finally, and it’s great reading long internet articles on my Kindle. Anyway, I’m going to try writing shorter posts and see how that goes.
This is kind of a bittersweet article for me, because I like jRPGs and he puts a lot of the reasons behind that into words. But then at the end, “our games are for kids,” is so terribly disappointing to me. May as well give up on Final Fantasy now, apparently. Hopefully they figure that out before dumping millions of dollars into development.
It’s not all bad, though - Square-Enix may suck at console RPGs now, but they’re not the only ones making them. The DS is chock full of great ones, and hopefully the 3DS can continue that. The thing about the DS is that it’s dirt cheap to develop for, but I doubt the 3DS is. Actually, very few current gen jRPGs have been very good… At best, they’re just prettier PS2 games and that makes them pretty mediocre. Stuff like Hyperdimension Neptunia, Ar Tonelico Qoga, and Record of Agarest War appeal mainly to their dedicated existing fan base, if at all.
I’ve got enough of a backlog to play through that I’d never notice if no good games were released ever again, but still. It would be nice to see something fantastic. Something like, say, Cthulhu Saves The World, which is literally the best jRPG I’ve played in recent memory. And it’s three dollars, and comes with a second game. WHY AREN’T YOU BUYING THIS? It’s less than a stupid Starbucks coffee!
[Alternatively titled: How I Learned to Stop Being Suicidal and Love Life]
A few weeks ago, a friend of mine told me they were feeling suicidal. Don’t worry - things have turned around completely, and this friend is feeling happy for the first time in a long while. Still, it made me think about the way I used to feel when I was suicidal - how I felt when I was 10, and the slightly more refined thoughts I had during junior high and high school. It made me realize how much I’ve grown up, and I thought it was worth sharing. I’ll try to be concise! Sometimes you have to explore a few tangents, but I’ll try to keep them relevant.
I gave a quick history in my Depression post last year, and I touched on my suicidal thoughts as well. One thing I forgot to mention was the feeling that I had nothing to live for. When I was 10, I thought that I was so smart and wanted to do great things - but I knew that the world doesn’t work that way and figured I’d wind up in a crappy office job, living a “normal” life. I was just a kid, you know? The life of an adult, in my mind, consisted solely of their job. It never occurred to me that I could have a normal job, and still do great things.
I wanted to improve the world, though, and since I wouldn’t do it at work, I thought it was impossible. Then I thought I could do it by taking myself out of the picture. When I realized that would only make things worse, I looked for other ways to make the world a better place. I figured that if I could improve at least one thing, no matter how small, I would have lived a worthwhile life. When I met Brittany in junior high, I decided my one thing would be to help her. I figured I could help her with her problems, and then she’d go off and be happy and it would all be thanks to me. I didn’t think that would take too long, and after that, even if I killed myself, I would have made the world a better place. It never quite worked out that way, but I held onto the idea that I could make people’s lives better in some small way and live a good life.
I knew that I couldn’t kill myself if anyone would be left behind to mourn me and blame themselves for my death, so I decided I would have to disappear quietly. The day no one would notice I was dead, I could slip away and that would be that. I figured that I could leave home after high school and gradually lose contact with my family, and then I’d just have to make sure they couldn’t trace my identity after I died. I felt that it was inevitable that everyone in my life would leave me, so when that happened, I’d be free to end it. “Unfortunately” for my tenth grade self, I’ve made new connections and gotten closer to everyone else, more or less foiling this plot.
You know how sometimes you can’t figure out whether something actually happened, or you just had a dream and thought it happened? I get that sometimes, except I can’t remember whether I said something or just thought about saying it. Either way, in high school I once said (or thought I said) that I “wanted to be happy when I grew up.” Which is super dramatic, and sad, and that’s what really made me want to say it. I was also trying to say that it didn’t matter what I “was when I grow up,” in terms of what career I chose - as long as I had enough to survive and something else to make me happy, I’d be ok.
What I realized, thinking about all of this, is that I’ve done it. I grew up. I’m happy with my life, and I’ll still be happy no matter where things go from here. That’s not to say that everything is perfect; I just know that I can deal with and overcome pretty much anything. I’m happy with who I am, and I think I’m a good person. I doubt I’m radically changing the lives of everyone I meet, but I’ve made good friends and I’m helping out whenever I can. Enough to say I’m a net positive influence on the world, at least, which was always the plan. And that’s enough to make me happy!
Should I apologize for not posting while I’m on vacation? I feel guilty about it anyway, but I’m thinking most people focus on their vacation and don’t post at all. Well, I love you too much to stay away for long. Also, I can’t help but think up tumblr posts when I should be sleeping, and the best cure for that is to actually write one before bed.
If that’s not a significant caveat, I don’t know what is.
Anyway, I have news! News big enough for its own post, even. It’s a big change, technically, but at the same time I’m hoping for a minimal amount of changes to accommodate it. If that makes sense. Ideally, I’ll be able to continue working at the same pace I have been and life will go on as usual, except with an extra person living in my house.
I’ll skip the long story of how we got to this point and summarize: Brittany is moving in at my mom’s place, and she’ll stay there while I’m at my dad’s. I’m giving up my bedroom, but I prefer to sleep on the futon in the basement anyway, so all that’s left is to figure out where I’ll move my “office.” No big deal, although everybody’s worried about us living together, but it’s not as bad as it sounds.
If you’ve been reading my tumblr long enough, you probably know Brittany as my ex-girlfriend. But we broke up two and a half years ago now, and I don’t think our status as an ex-couple (do people say that? makes sense to me) defines our relationship anymore. I mean, yeah, we dated and we broke up - but there’s no tension, no unresolved issues, none of the things you would expect when you’re meeting someone’s ex for the first time. And the more time I spend with her now, the more comfortable I am with the way things are - we’re friends, the same way I’m friends with Vael, Sebastian, or Max.
I’ve been offering to let Brittany stay with us pretty much since we decided to move to Ottawa, mainly because I’ve always thought her family treats her terribly. Her mom has been threatening to kick her out recently, or at least make her pay rent, which is difficult considering how few jobs are available in Summerside. Ottawa, on the other hand, has many more opportunities. So I asked my mom if she could stay with us, because it would be cheaper for her than getting an apartment in Summerside, and she’d have better odds of saving up money for school. Fast-forward to our vacation, and Brittany came out to dinner with us. One of the first things my mom says is “so Brittany, are you coming back to Ottawa with us?” At first she said maybe, and then there was much discussion and working out of details, and now the answer is yes.
I figure I’ll be introducing her as my friend from now on, and that’ll avoid plenty of awkward situations where people misunderstand or assume things. Not like it’ll be a secret that we dated, but if it comes up, I’ll just say she turned me into a newt and then I got better. Or something along those lines. I just want to say that I got better and make it clear that it’s a Monty Python reference.
Anyway, that’s that. There’s not really a whole lot to say aside from re-assuring everyone about the way things are between us now, so there you go. Consider yourself assured!
tl;dr: my ex-girlfriend is going to be my roommate, but it’s not what you think
vael:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/evolving-google-design-and-experience.html
And no, no one seems to like the grey bar at the top. You either go completely grim or don’t attempt at all, Google.
I like the grey bar at top, it fits perfectly with my firefox theme and at first I actually thought it was influenced by my Gmail theme. I hated the white bar with the little blue highlights before, so this is awesome.
I’m too busy doing things/not having internet access to tumbl, but I’ll get around to it soon, I swear!
Lots of stuff going on ‘round here, but I’m feeling pretty tired and thought of something somewhat interesting to post. The origins of my tumblr’s name and url! Or my account name, or whatever you call the x in x.tumblr.com. And on a related note, the origin of the “Demi” name you’ll see people refer to every once in a while.
“The lows are low, but the highs are home” is a quote from the song Chasing Hamburg by Polar Bear Club, the title track from their 2009 album. Apparently the song is about one specific gig they played in Hamburg, the idea being that it was an awesome show and they’re “chasing” that kind of fantastic feeling. What I took from that specific line was sometimes life is shitty, but that’s not the point - you’re living for the high points, which more than make up for the lows. It’s not just optimism for the future, it’s having the resilience to deal with the crappy stuff on the way.
“lamattgrind” is an anagram of my first and last names, in the sense of “this is about the daily grind of my life.” University is a bit less monotonous than high school was at times, but it’s still pretty grind-y. Go to class, study before going to the next class, repeat once or twice before going home. Then prepare for tomorrow’s classes. It’s not so bad, but there’s a definite predictability to it. Which sounds pretty depressing, but it’s not actually that bad.
As for the Demi thing, that’s a bit of a longer story, but I’ll try to skip the boring parts. A few years ago, I stumbled upon a browser based game called MonBre. You needed to pick a first and last name for your player character, so I went with “Rakki Lesthys” - the names of two characters I’d used in a story a long time ago, and continued to use in party based RPGs. Eventually I decided to change to a more masculine name, and at work grabbed inspiration from a box of pastries. “Demi Lune” seemed like a great name at the time, despite being more feminine in retrospect and thus defeating the purpose of the change. As I became close friends with the creator of MonBre, a certain Vael Victus, he decided I qualified for adoption into the Victus family and the name changed to Demi Victus.
Did you want to know any of these things? Probably not, but now you do! I’d planned to do a similar post on the origins of all my various interests and hobbies, which would either be far more interesting or far more boring. If I get the itch to finish that, you’ll see it when it’s done.
Now that I’ve started tagging my posts, I’m getting followers from random corners of the ‘net who are probably only interested in one portion of what I post. Unfortunately, this isn’t a dedicated gaming blog or a blog about anime or any one specific thing. It’s my personal blog, so it’s only about those things insofar as they’re a part of who I am. I wouldn’t bother to follow someone if I wasn’t interested in most of their posts, but that’s just the way I do things.
As I’ve mentioned before, this isn’t some expertly curated internet persona. I’m not trying to present some ideal version of myself and get thousands of readers. I’m just sharing myself with anyone that’s interested, including my flaws (not that I have many… right?!). Looking back, there are some posts that I probably shouldn’t have made, and a number that I wouldn’t have bothered to make now. But that’s ok, because they’re wholly representative of who I was when I wrote them. I can read them and remember how I felt at the time or think about how much I’ve changed.
Just keep that in mind if you ever decide to brave my archives.
————————————————————-
On an unrelated note, I’m starting to feel a bit guilty about how I’ve been spending my time lately. Having failed spectacularly thus far to establish a new circle of friends in Ottawa, I’ve got nothing to do other than hang out by myself and do whatever I feel like doing. Watch a bit of anime, play three different games for an hour each, whatever. It hasn’t been particularly stressful, but it’s not like I’m having the time of my life.
I’m looking at forcing myself to do something productive, but I… don’t really want to. I guess I should mention that, for better or for worse, I do have a job. More on that later. It doesn’t start until July, though, so I’ve got some time to relax. Should I really spend that time working on something I don’t really want to do, like learning C? I guess that could help me get a job next summer. But I have a hard time caring right now. I don’t think I’d feel particularly fulfilled if I were working on that. Which is what I’m looking for, really - something I can be proud to have accomplished. Just not sure what that is at the moment.
You’re expecting a lengthy diatribe, right? For once, you’re (mostly) wrong!
I’ve used the terms “better” and “for the most part” several times in this review, and I think those two terms sum up inFAMOUS 2 well. It’s not perfect, and it’s not quite a great game, but it’s better than its predecessor and for the most part very good. It’s a game with plenty of enjoyable content, and it’s one you won’t regret buying. It is, quite simply, a good time.
That’s the ending paragraph of the review, and here’s the score: 87/100. I played the first inFamous, and here’s what I’ll say about it: it’s your average third person adventure title. After playing the demo of inFamous 2, I have this to say: it’s still your average third person adventure title. But now it’s a sequel. I doubt I’ll even rent it, because I’ve got other, fantastic games to play.
So why is this game, one that’s pretty much average, not quite great, but still pretty fun, getting 87/100? Why is every review it receives going to give it an 8 or 9, with the most blasphemous heathens stooping to a 7? Ask any self-respecting critic, in any other medium, what score they’d give to something fun, but not quite great. They’ll probably say 6 or 7. And they’re right. It’s game reviewers who are wrong.
I’ve been holding off on a link-based post for a while because I’ve had more interesting things to post, but now I really need to clear out my bookmarks, so here’s a giant pile of awesome stuff for you!
Anime:
Assorted Lifehacker stuff:
Gaming: